Issue 4-86, 2018

Efficiency of rehabilitation after milinvasive osteosynthesis of fractures of the derivative valve

View article (Download PDF file)



Download XML file

1 Solod E.I., 1 Lazarev A.F., 2,3 Tsykunov M.B., 1 Ovcharenko А.V.

1 Department of acute injury of the Federal State Budgetary Institution "National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
2 The Department of Medical Rehabilitation of the Faculty of Additional Professional Education of the Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education "The Russian National Medical Research University named after N.I. Pirogov" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
3 Division of Medical Rehabilitation of the Federal State Budgetary Institution "National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia


ABSTRACT

On the basis of a complex of clinical data and the results of radiation diagnosis of 84 patients', it was shown that in caseof minimally invasive osteosynthesis of acetabulum fractures, rehabilitation measures should be started from the first daysafter the operation. The system-forming principle of the rehabilitation program is a long-term axial unloading of the damagedlimb for at least 6 months with adequate training of the periarticular muscles. The long-term results in terms of up to 10years in 42 patients were studied. The results were evaluated on the Harris scale and amounted to 85.5±4.2 points. In 19% ofcases after 5 years, aseptic necrosis developed, which became the basis for endoprosthesis.


KEYWORDS: rehabilitation, osteosynthesis, acetabular fractures.


References:

  1. Kaplan A.V. Hip joint damage. Orthopedics and traumatology and prosthetics. 1981; 4: 12-17.
  2. Cherkes-Zade D.I. Fractures of the pelvic bones. Manual «Traumatology and Orthopedics». M. 1997; 268.
  3. V.P. Voloshin, G.A. Onoprienko, V.S. Zubikov, D.V. Martynenko. Surgical treatment of overturn fractures of the hip bone. Almanac of Clinical Medicine № 19’2008 p.37-42
  4. Judet R., Judet J. Leturnel, E. Fracture of Acetabulum classification and sur-gical approaches for open reduction, J. Bone and Joint Surg.-1964.-46 (8) P.1615-1646.
  5. AB Kazantsev, AA Ter-Grigoryan, SMPutyatin, SI Makarova, G.Enikeev Endoprosthesis after acetabular fractures. Bulletin of Experimental and Clinical Surgery, Vol. IV, No. 4, 2011. 845-847.
  6. Filatov OM Surgical treatment of chronic and improperly fused fractures of the acetabulum. Author’s abstract. dis. cand. honey. sciences. Moscow. 1992; 21.
  7. Lazarev A.F. Surgical treatment of pelvic injuries. Author’s abstract. dis. Dr. honey. sciences. Moscow. 1992; 38.
  8. Zorya VI, Proklova EV Posttraumatic protrusion coxarthrosis. Herald of Traumatology and Orthopedics. Priorova 2001; 4: 38-41.
  9. Solod EI, Lazarev AF, Lazarev AA, Gudushauri Ya. G., Kakabadze MG, Roskydailo AS, Dan IM. Opportunities of operative treatment of acetabular fractures with the use of minimally invasive technologies. Herald of traumatology and orthopedics named after N.N. Priory No. 2 April-June 2009 with. 3-9.
  10. Milyukov A.Yu. Arthroscopy for diseases and injuries of the hip joint / A.Yu. Milyukov, A. A. Pronsky, V.V. Aghajanyan // VIII Congress of Traumatologists-Orthopedists.
  11. Zamzam M.M. Unstable pelvic ring injuries. Outcome and timing of surgical treatment by internal fixation / M.M. Zamzan // Saudi Med.J. - 2004. - Vol. 25, N 11. - P. 1670 - 1674.
  12. Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC, et al: Fractures of the acetabulum. A retrospective analysis, Clin Orthop Relat Res 205: 230-40, 1986.
  13. Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H. Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005; 87: 2-9.
  14. Matta JM, Mehne DK, Rof fi R. Fractures of the acetabulum: early results of a prospective study. Clin Orthop 1986; 205: 241-50
  15. Tile M, Helfet D, Kellam J. Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum, 3rd ed., Baltimore: Lippincott, Wilkins and Williams; 2003 [chapters 27 and 30].
  16. Letounel E, Judet R. Fractures of the acetabulum, 2nd ed., Berlin: SpringerVerlag; 1993.
  17. J.L. Gary et al. Survivorship of the native hip joint after percutaneous repair of acetabular fractures in the elderly. / Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 42 (2011) 1144-1151
  18. Mouhsine E, Garofalo R, Borens O, et al. Percutaneous retrograde screwing for stabilization of acetabular fractures. Injury 2005; 36: 1330-6.
  19. Starr AJ, Jones AL, Reinert CM, Borer DS. Preliminary results and complications The following limited open-cuts and percutaneous screw-ups of the acetabulum. Injury 2001; 32: 45-50.
  20. Gay SB, Sistrom C, Wang GJ, et al. Percutaneous screw fi xation of acetabular fractures with CT guidance: preliminary results of a new technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 819-22.
  21. Mears D.S., Velyvis J.H. Primary total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture // J. Bone Jt Surgery. - 2000.- V. 82. - P. 1328.
  22. Bellabarba C, Berger RA, Bentley CD, et al. Cementless acetabular reconstruction after acetabular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 868-76. A.
  23. Quesnot, J.-C. Chanussot Reeducation de lappareil locomoteur.- 2e edition. Tom 1: member inferieur, Chapitre 3 - Fracture du cotyle.- P. 35-48
  24. Strickland et al. Pressions subies par le cotyle durant la readaptation apres intevantion.-KS, 1994, 337: 43-52



Creative Commons License
The content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

©


This is an open article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by the National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology.