Issue 1-21, 2022

Review article

https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2022-21-1-98-103

Physical Medicine and Medical Rehabilitation in “Restorative” Ophthalmology: Historical Stages and Development Prospects

View article (Download PDF file)



Download XML file

1 ORCIDIgor G. Ovechkin, 2 ORCIDVladimir E. Yudin, 3 ORCIDAlexander V. Shakula, 4 ORCIDNikolay I. Ovechkin

1 Federal Research and Clinical Center of Specialized Medical Care and Medical Technologies, Moscow, Russian Federation
2 Moscow State University of Food Production, Moscow, Russian Federation
3 National Medical Research Center of Rehabilitation and Balneology, Moscow, Russian Federation
4 Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of the Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russian Federation


ABSTRACT

An overview of the historical stages of “restorative ophthalmology” is presented, taking into account the main directions of the concept of“Wellness of Healthy Eyes” in order to prevent and correct asthenopia in patients with visually strenuous work, based on a three- levelsystem of prevention and correction of functional visual disorders. The fi rst level is aimed at increasing the patient’s awareness of issuesof vision protection and hygiene. The second level is aimed at reducing the adverse eff ects of environmental factors on the state ofvision. The third level is realized in the form of methods of specifi c and nonspecifi c stimulation of the organ of vision. The urgency ofconsidering a new scientifi c problem in ophthalmology related to the development of the concept of diagnostics and assessment ofthe therapeutic measures eff ectiveness from the standpoint of modern requirements for medical rehabilitation has been substantiated.It is proposed that a practical solution to this problem should be carried out through the development of qualifi catory signs of theinternational classifi cation of functioning, adequate questionnaires for assessing the “quality of life” in actual eye pathology (asthenopia,cataract), as well as an assessment of traditional (conservative, surgical) treatment from the standpoint of modern basic characteristicsof medical rehabilitation (rehabilitation goal, rehabilitation diagnosis, rehabilitation prognosis, etc.).Conclusion. The most important task of medical focus is to preserve the functional state of the human operator’s visual analyzer ata level that allows performing professional activities with the required reliability and quality indicators.


KEYWORDS: visually strenuous work, medical rehabilitation, international classifi cation of functioning, asthenopia, cataract

FOR CITATION: Ovechkin I.G., Yudin V.E., Shakula A.V., Ovechkin N.I. Physical Medicine and Medical Rehabilitation in “Restorative” Ophthalmology: Historical Stages and Development Prospects. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2022; 21 (1):98-103. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2022-21-1-98-103


References:

  1. Розенблюм, Ю.З., Корнюшина Т. А., Фейгин А. А. Пути развития офтальмоэргономики. Медицина труда и промышленная экология. 2002; 1(6): 1–5.
  2. Разумов А. Н., Пономаренко В. А., Пискунов В. А. Здоровье здорового человека (Основы восстановительной медицины). Москва. Медицина. 1996: 413 с.
  3. Полунин Г. С., Макаров И. А. Физиотерапевтические методы в офтальмологии. Москва. Медицинское информационное агентство. 2012: 208 с.
  4. Разумова А. Н., Овечкина И. Г. Восстановительная офтальмология. Москва. Воентехиздат. 2006: 96 с.
  5. Проскурина О. В. Актуальная классификация астенопии: клинические формы и стадии. Российский офтальмологический журнал. 2016; (4): 69–73.
  6. Шакула А. В., Емельянов Г. А. Аккомодационные эффекты аудиовизуальной стимуляции у пациентов зрительно- напряженного труда с нарушениями психологической адаптации. Вопросы курортологии, физиотерапии и лечебной физической культуры. 2014; (1): 6–8.
  7. Емельянов Г. А., Щукин С. Ю. Сравнительный анализ методов специфической и неспецифической восстановительной коррекции аккомодационно-рефракционной системы глаза в условиях многопрофильного стационара. Военно- медицинский журнал. 2012; 133(4): 72–73.
  8. Овечкин И. Г. Юдин В. Е., Емельянов Г. А., Миронов А. В. Мультидисциплинарный подход к коррекции аккомодационно-рефракционных нарушений у пациентов зрительно-напряженного труда. Офтальмология. 2015; 12(2): 68–73.
  9. Иванова Г. Е. Пилотный проект «Развитие системы медицинской реабилитации в Российской Федерации». Общие принципы и протокол. Вестник Ивановской медицинской академии. 2016; 21(1): 6–11.
  10. Аухадеев Э. И., Бакиров Р. С., Гаврилов О. П., Мясникова Г. Р. Возможности и перспективы применения Международной классификации функционирования, ограничений жизнедеятельности и здоровья — МКФ в реальных условиях учреждения медицинской реабилитации. Казань. Бриг. 2011: 188 с.
  11. Иванова Г. Е., Булатова М. А., Поляев Б. Б., Трофимова А. К. Применение международной классификации функционирования, ограничений жизнедеятельности и здоровья в реабилитационном процессе. Вестник восстановительной медицины. 2021; 20(6): 4–33. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2021-20-6-4-33
  12. Miraftabi A., Coleman A.L., Nilforushan N., Parsamanesh M., Nguyen A. H., Karimi N. Vision-Related Quality of Life in Patients with a History of Congenital Glaucoma. European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2020; V.3(6): 3074–3079. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120977354
  13. Al- Dairi W., Al Saeed A., Sowayigh O. Impact of Quarantine During COVID-19 Pandemic on the Quality of Life of Patients with Allergic Conjunctivitis. Cureus Journal Medical Science. 2020; 12(12): e12240 p. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12240
  14. Azoulay- Sebban L., Zhao Z., Zenouda A., Lombardi M. Correlations Between Subjective Evaluation of Quality of Life, Visual Field Loss, and Performance in Simulated Activities of Daily Living in Glaucoma Patients. Journal of Glaucoma. 2020; 29(10): 970–974. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001597
  15. Kandel H., Watson S. L. Quality-of-life researchers in ocular allergy may benefi t from the newer methods. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2021; 9(1): 595–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.067
  16. Artesani M. C., Esposito M., Sacchetti M., Sansone A., Romanzo A. et al. Health- related quality of life in children at the diagnosis of Vernal Kerato- conjunctivitis. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology. 2021; 32(6): 1271–1277. https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.13520
  17. Ng H., Vermeer K. A., van Meurs J. C., La Heij E. C. Visual Acuity Inadequately Refl ects Vision- Related Quality of Life in Patients After Macula-Off Retinal Detachment Surgery. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2020; 61(10): 34 p. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.10.34
  18. Virgili G., Parravano M., Viola F., Varano M. Vision-related quality of life in patients treated for myopic choroidal neovascularization: A post hoc analysis of the OLIMPIC study. European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2020; 30(5): 1069–1075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672119853745
  19. Wei Bian, Junli Wan, Mingqiong Tan, Jun Su, Yi Yuan, Zonghua Wang, Shiying Li. Predictors of health- related quality of life in Chinese patients receiving treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a prospective longitudinal study. BioMed Central Ophthalmology. 2020; 20(1): 291 p. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01561-3
  20. Şahl E., Share İdil Ş. A. Comparison of Quality of Life Questionnaires in Patients with Low Vision. Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021; 51(2): 83–88. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.99975
  21. Selivanova A., Fenwick E., Man R., Seiple W., Jackson M. L. Outcomes After Comprehensive Vision Rehabilitation Using Vision- related Quality of Life Questionnaires: Impact of Vision Impairment and National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire. Optometry and Vision Science. 2019; 96(2): 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001327
  22. Xue W. W., Zou H. D. Rasch analysis of the Chinese Version of the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology. 2019; 55(8): 582–588. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2019.08.007
  23. Овечкин И. Г., Юдин В. Е., Ковригина Е. И., Будко А. А., Матвиенко В. В. Методологические принципы разработки опросника «качества жизни» у пациентов с явлениями компьютерного зрительного синдрома. Офтальмология. 2021; 18(4): 926–931. https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-4-926-931
  24. Jеbb A. T., Ng V., Tay L. A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995–2019. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; (12): 637547. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637547
  25. Lee J. H., Han K., Kim T. H., Kim A. R., Kwon O. et al. Acupuncture for dry eye syndrome after refractive surgery: A randomized controlled pilot trial. Integrative Medicine Research. 2021; 10(1): 100456 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100456
  26. Eguchi A., Hasegawa H., Kinouchi H., Murakami A., Kobayashi H. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index for dry eye disease. British Medical Journal Open. 2019; 9(11): e033940 p. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033940
  27. Marino P. F., Rossi M., Campagna G., Capobianco D., Costagliola C. Effects of Citicoline, Homotaurine, and Vitamin E on Contrast Sensitivity and Visual-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Primary Open- Angle Glaucoma: A Preliminary Study. Molecules. 2020; 25(23): 5614 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235614



Creative Commons License
The content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

©


This is an open article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by the National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology.