Issue №1-21, 2022

Original article

https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2022-21-1-70-78

Experience of Rhythmic Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation Application in the Treatment of Pareses of Various Etiologies at the Foot Level and the Objectiveness of Assessing the Dynamics of Motor Disorders. Literature Review

View article (Download PDF file)



Download XML file

1 ORCIDAlexey V. Kuzyuberdin, 1 ORCIDSergey M. Karpov, 1 ORCIDAnton A. Shatokhin, 1 ORCIDIrina A. Vyshlova, 1 ORCIDAnastasia I. Raevskaya

1 Stavropol State Medical University, Stavropol, Russian Federation


ABSTRACT

The aim of this work is to study the current issue state of using rhythmic peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) in the rehabilitation ofpatients with paresis of the lower extremities with lower lumbar radiculopathy. The article presents information on the use of rPMS inthe rehabilitation of patients with motor impairments in various diseases. The world experience of the eff ectiveness and reliability ofthe technique application in patients with various motor disorders has been analyzed. It is clarifi ed that this direction in the domesticand foreign literature is represented by few works, and the rehabilitation of patients with paresis of the foot after discectomy at thelower lumbar level is insuffi ciently expanded on a topic.Conclusion. Our literature analysis shows a good clinical eff ect of using low-frequency stimulation in the treatment of motor disorders,which turned out to be identical to that obtained by a number of authors who used low-frequency rTMS in similar studies. The issue ofusing the rPMS method in the rehabilitation of patients with paresis of the lower extremities remains relevant and promising.


KEYWORDS: lumbar osteochondrosis, rhythmic peripheral magnetic stimulation, rPMS, herniated disc, lower lumbar radiculopathy

For citation: Kuzyuberdin A.V., Karpov S.M., Shatokhin A.A., Vyshlova I.A., Raevskaya A.I. Experience of Rhythmic Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation Application in the Treatment of Pareses of Various Etiologies at the Foot Level and the Objectiveness of Assessing the Dynamics of Motor Disorders. Literature Review. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2022; 21 (1):70-78. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2022-21-1-70-78



References:

  1. Podchufarova E. V., Yahno N. N., Alekseev V. V., Avedisova A. S., Chahava K. O., Ershova E. M., Protasenko T. V. Hronicheskie bolevye sindromy poyasnichno- krestcovoĭ lokalizacii: znachenie strukturnyh skeletno- myshechnyh rasstroĭ stv i psihologicheskih faktorov [Chronic pain syndromes of the lumbosacral localization: the signifi cance of structural musculoskeletal disorders and psychological factors]. Pain. 2003; (1): 38–43 (In Russ.).
  2. Podchufarova, E.V. YAhno N. N. Bol’ v spine [Backache]. Moscow. 2013: 368 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Aihara T., Takahashi K., Ogasawara A. et al. Intervertebral disc degeneration associated with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: a clinical and an- atomical study. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2005; 87(5): 687–91. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.15727
  4. Borodulina I. V., Rachin A. P. Patogeneticheskie podhody k terapii obostreniya hronicheskoĭ boli v spine: opisanie klinicheskogo sluchaya [Patho- genetic approaches to the treatment of exacerbation of chronic back pain: a description of a clinical case]. Medical Council. 2019; (12): 42–47. https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2019-12-42-47 (In Russ.).Danilov A. B., Zharkova T. R. Hronicheskaya radikulopatiya: novye vozmozhnosti terapii [Chronic radiculopathy: new possibilities of therapy]. RMJ. 2010; (0): 15–20 (In Russ.).
  5. Popelyanskij Ya. Yu. Ortopedicheskaya nevrologiya (vertebronevrologiya): rukovodstvo dlya vrachej [Orthopedic neurology (vertebroneurology): a guide for physicians]. Moscow. 2011: 672 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Musaev A. B., Gusejnova S. G., Imamverdieva S. S., Mustafaeva E. E., Musaeva I. R. Issledovanie kachestva zhizni v lechenii i reabilitacii nevrologich- eskih bol’nyh [Study of the quality of life in the treatment and rehabilitation of neurological patients]. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2006; (1): 13–19 (In Russ.).
  7. Benzon H. T., Raja S. N., Molloy R. E. Essentials of Pain Medicine. NewYork. Elsevier- Churchill- Livingstone. 2011: 688 р.
  8. Hashemi M., Jafarian A. A., Tofi ghi S., Mahluji K. Studying the Eff wctiveness of One Type of Iranian Traditional Massage on Lumbar Radiculopathy.
  9. Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016; 41(3): 11 p.
  10. Gitkina L. S., Smychek V. B., Ryabceva T. D. Kliniko- reabilitacionnyegruppy kak osnova diff erencirovannogo podhoda k ocenke eff ektivnosti reabil- itacii [Clinical and rehabilitation groups as the basis for a diff erentiated approach to assessing the eff ectiveness of rehabilitation]. Issues of Orga- nization and Information Health. 1999; (1): 25–31 (In Russ.).
  11. Gushcha A. O., Arestov S. O. Opyt endoskopicheskih vmeshatel’stv pri patologii pozvonochnika [Experience of endoscopic interventions in spinal pathology]. Endoscopic Surgery. 2010: 48–56 (In Russ.).
  12. Arestov S. O., Vershinin A. V., Gushcha A. O. A comparative analysis of the eff ectiveness and potential of endoscopic and microsurgical resection of disc herniations in the lumbosacral spine [Comparison of the eff ectiveness and capabilities of endoscopic and microsurgical methods for the removal of herniated intervertebral discs in the lumbosacral spine]. Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery. 2014; 78(6): 9–14 (In Russ.).
  13. Gadjradj P. S., Arts M. P., van Tulder M. W., Rietdijk W. J.R., Peul W. C., Harhangi B. S. Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Disk Herniation: An Inter- national Perspective. Spine. 2017; 42(23): 1826–1834. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002294
  14. Costanzo G., Cellocco P., Di Francesco A. et al. The role of JOA score as an indication for surgical or conservative treatment of symptomatic de- generative lumbar spinal stenosis. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 2005; 86(3): 150–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-005-0099-0
  15. Gibson J., Waddell G. Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse: updated Cochrane Review. Spine. 2007; (32): 1735–1747. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858
  16. Alentado V. J., Lubelski D., Steinmetz M. P., Benzel E. C., Mroz T. E. Optimal duration of conservative management prior to surgery for cervical and lumbar radiculopathy: a literature review. Global Spine Journal. 2014; 4(4): 279–86. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1387807
  17. Bradford D. S. Harrington Lecture: The Future of Academic Spine Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities. Spine. 2005; 30(12): 1345–1350. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000167071.74046.4e
  18. Sasaji T., Horaguchi K., Yamada N., Iwai K. Improvement of hip abductor muscle weakness after lumbar decompressive surgery. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012; 117(4): 426–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2012.708678
  19. Daminov V. D. Diff erencirovannoe primenenie stimulyacionnyh metodov v kompleksnom vosstanovitel’nom lechenii bol’nyh dorsopatiei posle diskektomii [Diff erentiated application of stimulation methods in complex restorative treatment of patients with dorsopathy after discectomy].
  20. Moscow. 2006: 150 p. (In Russ.).
  21. McGregor A.H., Hughes S. P. The evaluation of the surgical management of nerve root compression in patients with low back pain: Part 1: the as- sessment of outcome. Spine. 2002; 27(13): 1465–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200207010-00018
  22. Häkkinen A., Kautiainen H., Sintonen H., Ylinen J. Health related quality of life after lumbar disc surgery: a prospective study of 145 patients.
  23. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2005; 27(3): 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280400007430
  24. Lønne G., Solberg T. K., Sjaavik K., Nygaard Ø. P. Recovery of muscle strength after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective co- hort study with 1-year follow-up. European Spine Journal. 2012; 21(4): 655–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2122-x 23. Matsumoto M., Watanabe K., Hosogane N., Tsuji T., Ishii K., Nakamura M., Chiba K., Toyama Y. Recurrence of lumbar disc herniation after microendo- scopic discectomy. Journal of Neurological Surgery А Central European Neurosurgery. 2013; 74(4): 222–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1320031
  25. Johnsen L. G., Brinckmann P., Hellum C., Rossvoll I., Leivseth G. Segmental mobility, disc height and patient- reported outcomes after surgery for degenerative disc disease: a prospective randomised trial comparing disc replacement and multidisciplinary rehabilitation. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2013; 95-B(1): 81–9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B1.29829
  26. Chang S. B., Lee S. H., Ahn Y., Kim J. M. Risk factor for unsatisfactory outcome after lumbar foraminal and far lateral microdecompression. Spine. 2006; 31(10): 1163–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000216431.69359.91
  27. Hodges P., van den Hoorn W., Dawson A., Cholewicki J. Changes in the mechanical properties of the trunk in low back pain may be associated with recurrence. Journal of Biomechanics. 2009; 42(1): 61–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.001
  28. Danilov A. B., Zharkova T. R. Hronicheskaya radikulopatiya: novye vozmozhnosti terapii [Chronic radiculopathy: new possibilities of therapy]. RMJ. 2010; (0): 15–20 (In Russ.).
  29. Gorelikov A. E., Melnikova E. A., Razumov A. N., Rassulova M. A., Rud´I.M. Rehabilitation of the patients presenting with the operated spine syn- drome during the complicated postoperative period after discectomy [Rehabilitation of patients with the syndrome of the operated spine with a complicated course of the postoperative period after discectomy]. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy, and Exercise Therapy. 2017; 94(5): 40–47. https://doi.org/10.17116/kurort201794540-47 (In Russ.).
  30. Nikitin S. S., Kurenkov A. L. Metodicheskie osnovy transkranial’noj magnitnoj stimulyacii v nevrologii i psihiatrii. Rukovodstvo dlya vrachei [Meth- odological foundations of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology and psychiatry]. Moscow. 2006: 167 p. (In Russ.).
  31. Beaulieu L. D., Schneider C. Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation to reduce pain or improve sensorimotor impairments: A lit- erature review on parameters of application and aff erents recruitment. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2015; 45(3): 223–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2015.08.002
  32. Rossini P. M., Burke D., Chen R., Cohen L. G., Daskalakis Z., Di Iorio R., Di Lazzaro V., Ferreri F., Fitzgerald P. B.., George M. S., Hallett M., Lefaucheur J. P., Langguth B., Matsumoto H., Miniussi C., Nitsche M. A., Pascual- Leone A., Paulus W.., Rossi S, Rothwell J. C., Siebner H. R., Ugawa Y., Walsh V., Zie- mann U. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2015; 126(6): 1071–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001
  33. Savulescu S. E., Berteanu M., Filipescu I., Beiu C., Mihai M. M., Popa L. G., Popescu S. I., Balescu I., Bacalbasa N., Popescu M. N. Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS) in Subjects with Lumbar Radiculopathy: An Electromyography- guided Prospective, Randomized Study. In Vivo. 2021; 35(1): 623–627. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12300
  34. Barros Galvão S. C., Borba Costa dos Santos R., Borba dos Santos P., Cabral M. E., Monte- Silva K. Effi cacy of coupling repetitive transcranial mag- netic stimulation and physical therapy to reduce upper-limb spasticity in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2014; 95(2): 222–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.023
  35. Mansur C. G., Fregni F., Boggio P. S., Riberto M., Gallucci- Neto J., Santos C. M., Wagner T., Rigonatti S. P., Marcolin M. A., Pascual- Leone A. A sham stimulation- controlled trial of rTMS of the unaff ected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology. 2005; 64(10): 1802–4. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000161839.38079.92
  36. Nikolaev S. G. Elektromiografi ya: klinicheskij praktikum [Electromyography: clinical practice]. Ivanovo. 2013: 394 p. (In Russ.).
  37. Blohina V. N., Kuznecov A. N., Lebedev V. B., Melikyan E. G. Ritmicheskaya perifericheskaya magnitnaya stimulyaciya (RPMS) v reabilitacii pacientov s kompressionnoj radikulopatiej v rannie sroki posle mikrodiskektomii [Rhythmic peripheral magnetic stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with compression radiculopathy in the early stages after microdiscectomy]. Materialy 7 mezhdunarodnogo kongressa «Nejroreabilitaciya 2015» [Materials of the 7th International Congress “Neurorehabilitation 2015”]. Moscow. 2015: 38–43 (In Russ.).
  38. Khedr E. M., Ahmed M. A., Alkady E. A., Mostafa M. G., Said H. G. Therapeutic eff ects of peripheral magnetic stimulation on trau- matic brachial plexopathy: clinical and neurophysiological study. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2012; 42(3): 111–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2011.11.003
  39. Borodulina I. V., Badalov N. G., Muhina A. A., Gushcha A. O. Ocenka eff ektivnosti kompleksnogo lecheniya s primeneniem ritmicheskoj transkrani- al’noj magnitnoj stimulyacii i obshchih gidrogal’vanicheskih vannu pacientov s poyasnichno- krestcovoj radikulopatiej [Evaluation of the eff ec- tiveness of complex treatment using rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation and general hydrogalvanic bath in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy]. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2019; 1(89): 33–41 (In Russ.).
  40. Polson M. J., Barker A. T., Freeston I. L. Stimulation of nerve trunks with time-varying magnetic fi elds. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 1982; 20(2): 243–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441362
  41. Obayashi S., Takahashi R. Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation improves severe upper limb paresis in early acute phase stroke survivors.
  42. NeuroRehabilitation. 2020; 46(4): 569–575. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-203085
  43. Borodulina I. V., Badalov N. G., Gushcha A. O., Rachin A. P. Nemedikamentoznye tekhnologii medicinskoj reabilitacii v lechenii pacientov s radikul- yarnym bolevym sindromom [Non-drug technologies of medical rehabilitation in the treatment of patients with radicular pain syndrome]. Rus- sian Journal of Pain. 2018; 2(56): 248 p. (In Russ.).
  44. Blohina V. N. Ritmicheskaya perifericheskaya magnitnaya stimulyaciya v reabilitacii posle mikrodiskektomii na poyasnichnom urovne v rannie sroki posle operacii. Dokt, Diss. [Rhythmic peripheral magnetic stimulation in rehabilitation after microdiscectomy at the lumbar level in the early stages after surgery. Dokt, Diss.]. Moscow. 2019: 82–83 (In Russ.).
  45. Beaulieu L. D., Massé- Alarie H., Brouwer B., Schneider C. Noninvasive neurostimulation in chronic stroke: a double- blind ran- domized sham-controlled testing of clinical and corticomotor eff ects. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2015; 22(1): 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000032
  46. Krewer C., Hartl S., Müller F., Koenig E. Eff ects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper-limb spasticity and impairment in patients with spastic hemiparesis: a randomized, double- blind, sham-controlled study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2014; 95(6): 1039– 1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.02.003
  47. Gorelikov A. E., Mel’nikova E.A., Rud’ I. M. Magnitnaya stimulyaciya v lechenii i reabilitacii bol’nyh s zabolevaniyami nervnoj sistemy i pozvonoch- nika [Magnetic stimulation in the treatment and rehabilitation of patients with diseases of the nervous system and spine]. Medical Rehabilitation. 2017; 11(140): 48 p. (In Russ.).
  48. Hsu W. Y., Cheng C. H., Liao K. K., Lee I. H., Lin Y. Y. Eff ects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor functions in patients with stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2012; 43(7): 1849–57. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.649756
  49. Lefaucheur J. P., André- Obadia N., Antal A., Ayache S. S., Baeken C., Benninger D. H., Cantello R. M., Cincotta M., de Carvalho M., De Ridder D., Devanne H., Di Lazzaro V., Filipović S. R., Hummel F. C., Jääskeläinen S. K., Kimiskidis V. K., Koch G., Langguth B., Nyff eler T., Oliviero A., Padberg F., Poulet E., Rossi S., Rossini P. M., Rothwell J. C., Schönfeldt- Lecuona C., Siebner H. R., Slotema C. W., Stagg C. J., Valls- Sole J., Ziemann U., Paulus W., Garcia- Larrea L. Evidence- based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clinical Neurophysiolo- gy. 2014; 125(11): 2150–2206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021
  50. Viben K., Fal’kenberg B. Vizual’noe rukovodstvo po funkcional’nomu myshechnomu testirovaniyu [Muscle Function Testing –A Visual Guide]. Mos- cow. 2017: 12–14 (In Russ.).
  51. Hodges P., van den Hoorn W., Dawson A., Cholewicki J. Changes in the mechanical properties of the trunk in low back pain may be associated with recurrence. Journal of Biomechanics. 2009; 42(1): 61–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.001
  52. Hirano M., Katoh M., Gomi M., Arai S. Validity and reliability of isometric knee extension muscle strength measurements using a belt-stabilized hand-held dynamometer: a comparison with the measurement using an isokinetic dynamometer in a sitting posture. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2020; 32(2): 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.32.120 51. Hirano M., Katoh M. Absolute reliability of shoulder joint horizontal adductor muscle strength measurements using a handheld dynamometer.
  53. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2015; 27(7): 2125–7. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2125
  54. Chamorro C., Armijo- Olivo S., De la Fuente C., Fuentes J., Javier Chirosa L. Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand Held Dynamom- etry and Isokinetic Dynamometry in the Hip, Knee and Ankle Joint: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Open Medicine. 2017; (12): 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2017-0052
  55. Seven B., Cobanoglu G., Oskay D., Atalay- Guzel N. Test- Retest Reliability of Isokinetic Wrist Strength and Proprioception Measurements. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2019; 28(7): 2018–0341. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0341
  56. Drouin J. M., Valovich-mcLeod T.C., Shultz S. J., Gansneder B. M., Perrin D. H. Reliability and validity of the Biodex system 3 pro isoki- netic dynamometer velocity, torque and position measurements. The European Physical Journal Applied Physics. 2004; 91(1): 22–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-0933-0
  57. Martin H. J., Yule V., Syddall H. E., Dennison E. M., Cooper C., Aihie Sayer A. Is hand-held dynamometry useful for the measurement of quadriceps strength in older people? A comparison with the gold standard Bodex dynamometry. Gerontology. 2006; 52(3): 154–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000091824



Creative Commons License
The content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

©

Эта статья открытого доступа по лицензии CC BY 4.0. Издательство: ФГБУ «НМИЦ РК» Минздрава России.
This is an open article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by the National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology.

Aссоциация НАЭСКЛ