Issue 2-21, 2022

Review article

https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2022-21-2-70-79

Modern Aspects of Endoprosthetics in Hip Joint Osteoarthritis

View article (Download PDF file)



Download XML file

1 ORCIDKamariddin Kh. Khisomov, 1 Vyacheslav S. Ondar

1 Federal Сlinical Research Center of Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies, Moscow, Russian Federation


ABSTRACT

The surgical procedure for an artificial joint – the endoprosthesis implantation significantly improves the patient’s quality of life andhas a significant impact on his rehabilitation optimizing, necessary for a normal life in the future. Due to its anatomical characteristicsand biomechanical ratio, the hip joint plays a critical role in maintaining body balance and proper gait. Endoprosthesis is used ina significant hip joint function disorder. Indications for the endoprosthesis may be degenerative changes, various injuries or somecongenital disorders. A degenerative change, like coxarthrosis, leads to surgery due to its progression in almost all cases. Depending onan operator and a patient, this procedure can be performed in several ways depending on the chosen access to a thigh. Today, the directaccess is most commonly used from the front, side, and rear. The difference is in a place of entry into the joint and the damage to themuscles caused by the procedure itself. Physiotherapy is required after the procedure. The process of physiotherapy begins immediatelyafter the surgery, on the first day after the procedure. It is believed that, in the period of three to four months after rehabilitation, thepatient can return to almost all the previous usual activities, of course, after examination and consultation with the doctor.Aim. To analyze the literature data on modern aspects of arthroplasty in the hip joint osteoarthrosisResults. Various arthroplasty complications in coxarthrosis can be associated with errors in the surgery techniques, as well as the lackof patients’ motivation. The number of studies concerning quality of life and therefore health is growing, and the research results canbe used as relevant ones to represent the state of each individual group.


KEYWORDS: hip joint arthroplasty, osteoarthritis, prosthesis, rehabilitation, physiotherapy

FOR CITATION:

Khisomov K.Kh., Ondar V.S. Modern Aspects of Endoprosthetics in Hip Joint Osteoarthritis. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2022; 21(2): 70-79. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2022-21-2-70-79


For correspondence: Kamariddin Kh. Khisomov, e-mail: dr.khisomov@yahoo.com


References:

  1. Zagorodnij N.V., Evgenij Sh.L., Batygin G.G. Registry po endoprotezirovaniju tazobedrennogo sustava [Registers for hip arthroplasty]. RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2012; (3): 66–71 (In Russ.).
  2. Stampella A., Monteagudo S., Lories R. Wnt signaling as target for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2017; 31(5): 721–729.
  3. Alekseeva L.I. Osteoartrit: epidemiologija, klassifikacija, faktory riska i progressirovanija, klinika, diagnostika, lechenie [Osteoarthritis: epidemiology, classification, risk factors and progression, clinic, diagnosis, treatment]. Sovremennaja Revmatologija. 2019; 13(2): 9–21 (In Russ.).
  4. Gorjannaja N.A., Ishekova N.I., Popov V.V., Bondarenko E.G. Izmenenie kachestva zhizni pacientov posle endoprotezirovanija tazobedrennogo sustava na pervom etape reabilitacii [Changes in the quality of life of patients after hip arthroplasty at the first stage of rehabilitation]. Human Ecology. 2017; (1): 41–44 (In Russ.).
  5. Vishnjakov A.N. Istorija endoprotezirovanija v mire i v Rossii [History of arthroplasty in the world and in Russia.]. Vestnik Vserossijskogo Obshhestva Specialistov po Mediko-Social’noj Jekspertize, Reabilitacii i Reabilitacionnoj Industrii. 2018; (3): 89–92 (In Russ.).
  6. Kubasov I.N., Savcov D.V. Effektivnost’ i otdalennye rezul’taty jendoprotezirovanija krupnyh sustavov nizhnih konechnostej [Efficiency and longterm results of endoprosthesis replacement of large joints of the lower extremities.]. Social Aspects of Population Health. 2017: 450–452 (In Russ.).
  7. Gerasimova N.D., Kul’teleeva Zh.A., Smoljar Ja.V. Sovremennye aspekty profilaktiki koksartroza [Modern aspects of prevention of coxarthrosis]. Proryvnye Nauchnye Issledovanija kak Dvigatel’ Nauki. 2017: 8–9 (In Russ.).
  8. Grehov R.A., Aleksandrova N.V., Aleksandrov A.V. Ocenka effektivnosti lechenija bol’nyh osteoartrozom s pomoshh’ju kriterija kachestva zhizni pacientov [Evaluation of the effectiveness of the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis using the criterion of the quality of life of patients.]. Aktual’nye Problemy Sovremennoj Revmatologii. 2018: 142–149 (In Russ.).
  9. Ye Y. Platelet rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid in patients with hip osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Surgery. 2018; (53): 279–287.
  10. Drapkina O.M. Osteoartrit v praktike vracha-terapevta: algoritm diagnostiki i vybora terapii [Osteoarthritis in the practice of a therapist: an algorithm for diagnosis and choice of therapy.]. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina. 2018; 21(6): 12–22 (In Russ.).
  11. Zhadjaev N.A., Kondrat’ev S.P., Zhadjaev R.N. Otdalennye rezul’taty primenenija keramiko-polijetilenovyh par trenija pri endoprotezirovanii tazobedrennogo sustava [Long-term results of the use of ceramic-polyethylene friction pairs in hip arthroplasty]. Nacional’nye Proekty: Vyzovy i Reshenija. 2020: 471–474 (In Russ.).
  12. Ivanova A.V., Daudova P.G., Optovko D.A. Osobennosti techenija osteoartrita s razlichnymi fenotipami i komorbidnymi zabolevanijami [Features of the course of osteoarthritis with different phenotypes and comorbid diseases]. Aktual’nye Problemy Sovremennoj Mediciny. 2019: 89–94 (In Russ.).
  13. Kajafa A.M., Okaєvich O.A. Analiz otdalennyh rezul’tatov endoprotezirovanija tazobedrennogo sustava pri perelomah bedrennoj kosti v vertel’noj oblasti [Analysis of long-term results of hip arthroplasty in femoral fractures in the trochanteric region]. Vіsnik Morfologії. 2017; 23(1): 61–64 (In Russ.).
  14. Korol’ko A.S. Populjacionnaja harakteristika pacientov s koksartrozom. Izvestija Nacional’noj akademii nauk Belarusi [Population characteristics of patients with coxarthrosis]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical Series. 2019; 16(2): 156–165 (In Russ.).
  15. Lipov D.S. Biologicheskaja rol’ matriksnyh metalloproteinaz v processe vozniknovenija i progressirovanija osteoartroza [The biological role of matrix metalloproteinases in the onset and progression of osteoarthritis.]. Aktual’nye Problemy Eksperimental’noj i Klinicheskoj Mediciny. 2018: 492–492 (In Russ.).
  16. Wiznia D.H. Factors That Influence Bone-Ingrowth Fixation of Press-Fit Acetabular Cups. JBJS Reviews. 2019; 7(6): e2 p. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00147
  17. Lychagin A.V. Otdalennye funkcional’nye rezul’taty pervichnogo total’nogo endoprotezirovanija tazobedrennogo sustava pri drenirovanii rany [Long-term functional results of primary total hip arthroplasty during wound drainage]. Medical Science and Education of Ural. 2018; 19(4): 25-28 (In Russ.).
  18. Ljubchak V.V. Srednesrochnye i otdalennye rezul’taty jendoprotezirovanija tazobedrennogo sustava s ispol’zovaniem pary trenija metall–metal [Medium-term and long-term results of hip arthroplasty using a metal-metal friction pair]. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2019; (10): 55–61 (In Russ.).
  19. Hannouche D. Third-generation pure alumina and alumina matrix composites in total hip arthroplasty: what is the evidence? EFORT Open Reviews. 2018; 3(1): 7–14.
  20. Mazurov V.I., Trofimova A.S., Trofimov E.A. Faktory riska i nekotorye aspekty patogeneza osteoartrita [Risk factors and some aspects of the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis.]. Newsletter of North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov. 2016; 8(2): 116–124 (In Russ.).
  21. Menshhikova T.I. Ul’trazvukovye kriterii diagnostiki razlichnyh stadij pervichnogo i vtorichnogo koksartroza [Ultrasound criteria for the diagnosis of various stages of primary and secondary coxarthrosis]. Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology. 2019; 9(1): 75–88 (In Russ.).
  22. Onishhuk V.V. Vozmozhnosti terapevticheskogo vlijanija na patogeneticheskie zven’ja razvitija deformirujushhego osteoartrozom [Possibilities of therapeutic influence on the pathogenetic links in the development of deforming osteoarthritis]. Sovremennye Problemy Nauki i Obrazovanija. 2019; (1): 19–19 (In Russ.).
  23. Petrova A.A., Dorzheev V.V. Otdalennye rezul’taty total’nogo endoprotezirovanija tazobedrennogo sustava v GUZ «Gorodskaja klinicheskaja bol’nica № 1» Chity [Otdalennye rezul’taty total’nogo jendoprotezirovanija tazobedrennogo sustava v GUZ «Gorodskaya klinicheskaya bol’nica № 1» Chity]. Aktual’nye Voprosy Travmatologii i Ortopedii. 2017: 91–93 (In Russ.).
  24. Markatos K., Savvidou O.D., Foteinou A., Kosmadaki S., Trikoupis I., Goumenos S.D., Papagelopoulos P.J. Hallmarks in the History and Development of Total Hip Arthroplasty. Surgical Innovation. 2020: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350620947209
  25. Petrova A.A., Shestakov I.A., Il’in I.V. Rezul’taty total’nogo endoprotezirovanija tazobedrennogo sustava v GUZ «Gorodskaja klinicheskaja bol’nica № 1» g. Chity 2015–2018 gg [Rezul’taty total’nogo jendoprotezirovanija tazobedrennogo sustava v GUZ «Gorodskaya klinicheskaya bolnica № 1» Chity 2015–2018]. Medicina Zavtrashnego Dnja. 2019: 109–109 (In Russ.).
  26. Plaksina T.V. Sovremennye tendencii terapii osteoartrozom [Current trends in osteoarthritis therapy.]. Remedium Privolzh’e. 2017; (2): 32–36 (In Russ.).
  27. Serikova-Esengel’dina D.S., Goremykina M.V., Glushkova N.E. Epidemiologicheskie aspekty osteoartroza i total’nogo jendoprotezirovanija [Epidemiological aspects of osteoarthritis and total arthroplasty]. Science & Healthcare. 2019; (5): 5–10 (In Russ.).
  28. Tihilov R.M., Shubnjakov M.I., Bojarov A.A., Denisov A.O., Shubnjakov I.I. Vlijanie razlichnyh faktorov na tempy iznosa polijetilenovogo vkladysha v endoprotezah tazobedrennogo sustava [Influence of various factors on the wear rate of a polyethylene liner in hip joint endoprostheses]. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2018; 24(1): 18–28 (In Russ.).
  29. Cherkasov M.A., Tihilov R.M., Shubnjakov I.I., Kovalenko A.N., Mugutdinov Z.A. Udovletvorennost’ pacientov posle pervichnogo endoprotezirovanija tazobedrennogo sustava: prediktory uspeha [Patient satisfaction after primary hip arthroplasty: predictors of success]. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2018; 24(3): 45–54 (In Russ.).
  30. Shavlovskaja O.A. Jeffektivnost’ lokal’noj terapii NPVP pri OA razlichnoj lokalizacii [Efficacy of local NSAID therapy in OA of various localizations]. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2017; (11): 18–22 (In Russ.).
  31. Shishkova V. Sovremennyj vzgljad na vybor bezopasnoj terapii pri boljah v sustavah i spine u pacienta s komorbidnoj patologiej [A modern view on the choice of safe therapy for pain in the joints and back in a patient with comorbid pathology]. The Doctor. 2018; 29(5): 72–80 (In Russ.).
  32. Shubnjakov I.I., Riahi A., Shubnjakov M.I., Denisov A.O., Huzhanazarov I.Je. Tihilov R.M. Bescementnye bedrennye komponenty: istorija i sovremen- noe sostojanie voprosa [Cementless femoral components: history and current state of the issue]. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2020; 26(2): 160–179 (In Russ.).
  33. Flemming D.J., Gustas-French C.N. Rapidly progressive osteoarthritis: a review of the clinical and radiologic presentation. Current Rheumatology Reports. 2017; 19(7): 42 p.
  34. Foucher K.C. Gait abnormalities before and after total hip arthroplasty differ in men and women. Journal of Biomechanics. 2016; 49(14): 3582–3586.
  35. Güler T., Sivas F., Yurdakul F.G., Çelen E., Utkan A., Başkan B., Bodur H., Özkurt B. Early improvement in physical activity and function after total hip arthroplasty: Predictors of outcomes. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2019; 65(4): 379–388.
  36. Hofstede S.N. Preoperative predictors for outcomes after total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016; 17(1): 212 p.
  37. Hoskins W. Polished cemented femoral stems have a lower rate of revision than matt finished cemented stems in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 96,315 cemented femoral stems. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(5): 1472–1476.
  38. Lobanov G.V. Hirurgicheskoe lechenie asepticheskogo nekroza golovki bedra [Surgical treatment of aseptic necrosis of the femoral head]. Sovre- mennye Aspekty Travmatologii, Ortopedii i Rekonstruktivnoj Hirurgii. 2019: 75–77 (In Russ.).
  39. Huynh C., Puyraimond Zemmour D., Maillefert J.F. Factors associated with the orthopaedic surgeon’s decision to recommend total joint replacement in hip and knee osteoarthritis: an international cross-sectional study of 1905 patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018; 26(10).
  40. Jeschke E. Obesity increases the risk of postoperative complications and revision rates following primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 131,576 total hip arthroplasty cases. The Journal of Aarthroplasty. 2018; 33(7): 2287–2292.
  41. Vorokov A.A. Jendoprotezirovanie tazobedrennogo sustava: opredelenie pokazanij k operacii (nauchnyj obzor) [Hip arthroplasty: definition of indications for surgery (scientific review)]. Medico-Pharmaceutical Journal «Pulse». 2020; 22(6): 40–50 (In Russ.).
  42. Jones M.D., Buckle C.L. How does aseptic loosening occur and how can we prevent it? Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2020; 34(3): 146–152.
  43. Karachalios T., Komnos G., Koutalos A. Total hip arthroplasty: Survival and modes of failure. EFORT Open Reviews. 2018; 3(5): 232–239.
  44. Izmalkov S.N., Bratijchuk A.N., Usov A.K., Kuropatkin G.V. Srednesrochnye i otdalennye rezul’taty cementnoj fiksacii vertluzhnogo komponenta pri total’nom endoprotezirovanii tazobedrennogo sustava [Medium-term and long-term results of cement fixation of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty]. Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2017; 24(2): 88–94 (In Russ.).
  45. Konan S., Duncan C.P. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with neuromuscular imbalance. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2018; 100(1): 17–21.
  46. Kumar P. Quality of life following total hip arthroplasty in patients with acetabular fractures, previously managed by open reduction and internal fixation. Chinese Journal of Traumatology. 2016; 19(4): 206–208.
  47. Kurcz B. Osteolysis as it pertains to total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedic Clinics. 2018; 49(4): 419–435.
  48. Lamb J.N. A calcar collar is protective against early periprosthetic femoral fracture around cementless femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty: a registry study with biomechanical validation. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2019; 101(7): 779–786.
  49. Maslennikov S.O., Golovaha M.L. Biomechanical aspects of the development of hip dislocation after hip arthroplasty. TRAUMA. 2017; 18(6): 36–42.
  50. McIlwraith C.W. Biomarkers for equine joint injury and osteoarthritis. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2018; 36(3): 823–831.
  51. Meermans G. The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2017; 99(6): 732–740.
  52. Gorbatov R.O. Revizionnoe jendoprotezirovanie krupnyh sustavov s ispol’zovaniem individual’nyh gibridnyh endoprotezov [Revision arthroplasty of large joints using individual hybrid endoprostheses.]. Sovremennye Problemy Nauki i Obrazovanija. 2019; (4): 50 p. (In Russ.).
  53. Murphy N.J., Eyles J.P., Hunter D.J. Hip osteoarthritis: etiopathogenesis and implications for management. Advances in Therapy. 2016; 33(11): 1921–1946.
  54. Niemczewska-Wójcik M., Piekoszewski W. The surface topography of a metallic femoral head and its influence on the wear mechanism of a polymeric acetabulum. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 2017; (17): 307–317.
  55. Nistor D.V. Total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach versus lateral approach: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Trials in Orthopedic Disorders. 2018; 3(1): 18 p.
  56. Maksimova I.A. Nejrogennaja bol’ u bol’nyh osteoartrozom [Neurogenic pain in patients with osteoarthritis]. Alleja Nauki. 2020; 1(1): 279–282 (In Russ.).
  57. Pineda M.M.S. Analgesic effect and functional improvement caused by radiofrequency treatment of genicular nerves in patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the knee until 1 year following treatment. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 2017; 42(1): 62–68.
  58. Sato H. Effect of femoral offset and limb length discrepancy on hip joint muscle strength and gait trajectory after total hip arthroplasty. Gait & Posture. 2020; (77): 276–282.
  59. Winther S.B. Increased muscle strength limits postural sway during daily living activities in total hip arthroplasty patients. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2020; 99(7): 608 p.
  60. Zhang L. Local Cellular Responses to Metallic and Ceramic Nanoparticles from Orthopedic Joint Arthroplasty Implants. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2020; (15): 6705 p.



Creative Commons License
The content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

©


This is an open article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by the National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology.