Issue 23-6, 2024

Original article

https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2024-23-6-26-37

Approbation of the Methodology "Scale for Cognitive Status Assessment of the After-Stroke Patients with Speech Disorders"

View article (Download PDF file)



Download XML file

1,* ORCIDAnastasia V. Kotelnikova, 1 ORCIDIrena V. Pogonchenkova, 1 ORCIDAnna V. Titova, 1,2 ORCID Elena V. Kostenko, 1 ORCIDLiudmila V. Petrova

1 S.I. Spasokukotsky Moscow Centre for research and practice in medical rehabilitation, restorative and sports medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
2 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION. The development of a screening tool for diagnosing cognitive status in stroke patients with speech disorders is an urgent problem of rehabilitation.
AIM. To develop and validate a screening diagnostic technique for the cognitive status of patients after ischemic stroke with speech disorders.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The methodology "Scale for cognitive status assessment of the after-stroke patients with speech disorders" (ShKSPIR) was evaluated by a retrospective clinical and statistical analysis of 7814 patient medical histories, 1916 of which were patients with speech disorders due to ischemic stroke in the period up to 1 year: average age 66.5 ± 11.3 years, 843 (44.0 %) women, 1073 (56.0 %) men. Psychometric characteristics were studied in 147 patients (age — 63.0 ± 8.0 years, 26 (57.8 %) women, 19 (42.2 %) men), 40 patients of them (27.2 %) had speech disorders. The prognostic assessment, practical significance and competitive validity of the methodology were studied by comparing the results obtained with the data of the methodology with known psychometric characteristics ("Brief neuropsychological examination of the cognitive sphere").
RESULTS. Satisfactory psychometric characteristics of the technique have been proven: substantive and constructive validity, synchronous reliability, discriminativeness. The non-orthogonality of the three-factor structure explaining 55 % of the variance of the original data matrix is discussed. The practical significance is investigated and the high competitive validity of the tested methodology is shown. The standardization of indicators was carried out in accordance with the quantitative determinant of the ICF.
CONCLUSION. In the process of testing the ShKSPIR methodology, test standards have been developed and standardized. The technique can be used for screening assessment of the cognitive status of stroke patients with speech disorders, while planning individual rehabilitation programs.


KEYWORDS: stroke, aphasia, dysarthria, cognitive functions, memory, attention, speech, social intellect, praxis, gnosis

FUNDING: The authors declare no external funding in the conduct of the study.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

FOR CITATION:

Kotelnikova A.V., Pogonchenkova I.V., Titova A.V., Kostenko E.V., Petrova L.V. Approbation of the Methodology "Scale for Cognitive Status Assessment of the After-Stroke Patients with Speech Disorders". Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2024; 23(6):26-37. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2024-23-6-26-37 (In Russ.).

FOR CORRESPONDENCE:

Anastasiya V Kotelnikova, Е-mail: pav-kotelnikov@yandex.ru, nauka-org@mail.ru


References:

  1. Пирадов М.А., Максимова М.Ю., Домашенко М.А. Инсульт. Интенсивная терапия: национальное руководство, 2-й том. Москва: ГЭОТАР- Медиа. 2020; 1056 с. [Piradov M.A., Maksimova M.YU., Domashenko M.A. Insul't. Intensivnaya terapiya: nacional'noe rukovodstvo, 2-j tom. Moskva: GEOTAR-Media. 2020; 1056 s. (In Russ.).]
  2. Боголепова А.Н. Постинсультные когнитивные и астенические нарушения. Фармакология & Фармакотерапия. 2021; 2: 26–27. [Bogolepova A.N. Post-stroke cognitive and asthenic disorders. Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapy. 2021; 2: 26–27 (In Russ.).]
  3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5™ (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association. 2013; 947 p.
  4. Нейрореабилитация: учебное пособие для вузов под редакцией В.М. Шкловского. Москва: Юрайт. 2024; 401 с. [Nejroreabilitaciya: uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. Pod redakciej V.M. Shklovskogo. Moskva: YUrajt. 2024; 401 s. (In Russ.).]
  5. Котельникова А.В., Погонченкова И.В., Костенко Е.В. и др. Психометрическая апробация скрининговых методик диагностики когнитивного статуса постинсультных пациентов: обсервационное когортное исследование. Вестник восстановительной медицины. 2023; 22(2): 32–41. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2023-22-2-32-41 [Kotelnikova A.V., Pogonchenkova I.V., Kostenko E.V., et al. Psychometric Approbation of Screening Methods for the Diagnosis of Cognitive Status in a Sample of Ischemic Stroke Patients: an Observational Cohort Study. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2023; 22(2): 32–41. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2023-22-2-32-41 (In Russ.).]
  6. Тонконогий И.М. Краткое нейропсихологическое обследование когнитивной сферы (КНОКС). Москва: ПЕР СЭ. 2010; 69 с. [Tonkonogij I.M.
  7. Kratkoe nejropsihologicheskoe obsledovanie kognitivnoj sfery (KNOKS). Moskva: PER SE. 2010; 69 s. (In Russ.).] 7. Guo Y. A selective review of the ability for variants of the Trail Making Test to assess cognitive impairment. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022; 29(6): 1634–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.1887870 8. Parashos S.A., Johnson M.L., Erickson-Davis C., Wielinski C.L. Assessing cognition in Parkinson disease: use of the cognitive linguistic quick test. J.
  8. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol. 2009; 22(4): 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891988709342721
  9. Graeff D.B., Lui J.M., Zucco N.D.P., et al. Clock drawing test: comparison between the Pfizer and the Shulman systems. Dement Neuropsychol. 2021; 15(4): 480–484. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642021dn15-040009
  10. Benaim C., Wauquiez G., Pérennou D., et al. Cognitive assessment scale for stroke patients (CASP): A multicentric validation study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2022; 65(3): 101594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101594
  11. Международная классификация функционирования, ограничений жизнедеятельности и здоровья (полная версия). Санкт-Петербург: СПбИУВЭК. 2003; 342 с. [Mezhdunarodnaya klassifikaciya funkcionirovaniya, ogranichenij zhiznedeyatel'nosti i zdorov'ya (polnaya versiya). Sankt Peterburg: SPbIUVEK. 2003; 342 s. (In Russ.).]
  12. Наследов А.Д. Математические методы психологического исследования. Анализ и интерпретация данных: учебное пособие. Санкт- Петербург: Речь. 2010; 388 с. [Nasledov A.D. Matematicheskie metody psihologicheskogo issledovaniya. Analiz i interpretaciya dannyh: uchebnoe posobie. Sankt Peterburg: Rech'. 2010; 388 s. (In Russ.).]
  13. Кемстач В.В., Беляева С.И., Саковский И.В. Возможности исследования коннектома человека в связи с нарушением речевых функций. Психология человека в образовании. 2020; 2(2): 182–187. https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2020-2-2-182-187 [Kemstach V.V., Belyaeva S.I., Makovsky I.V. Possibilities of human connectome research in connection with impaired speech functions. Human psychology in education. 2020; 2(2): 182–187. https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2020-2-2-182-187 (In Russ.).]
  14. Алферова В.В., Майорова Л.А., Иванова Е.Г. и др. Функциональная нейровизуализация структур мозга, связанных с речью в норме и при постинсультной афазии. Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. C.C. Корсакова. 2017; 117(3–2): 71–78. https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro20171173271-78 [Alferova V.V., Mayorova L.A., Ivanova E.G., et al. Functional neuroimaging of brain structures associated with speech in normal and post-stroke aphasia. Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry named after C.C. Korsakov. 2017; 117(3–2): 71–78. https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro20171173271-78 (In Russ.).]
  15. Лиманова Л.В., Попов Н.В. Расчет дискриминативности и валидности для оценки качества педагогического теста из курса математики по теме «Ряды». Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук. Социальные, гуманитарные, медико-биологические науки. 2021; 23(1): 35–41. https://doi.org/10.37313/2413-9645-2021-23-76-35-41 [Limanova L.V., Popov N.V. Calculation of discriminativity and validity for assessing the quality of a pedagogical test from a mathematics course on the topic «Rows». Izvestiya Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social, humanitarian, medical and biological sciences. 2021; 23(1): 35–41. https://doi.org/10.37313/2413-9645-2021-23-76-35-41 (In Russ.).]
  16. Хомская Е.Д. Методологические и теоретические проблемы психологии в трудах А.Р. Лурия. Вопросы психологии. 1982; 66 с. [Homskaya E.D. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psihologii v trudah A.R. Luriya. Voprosy psihologii. 1982; 66 s. (In Russ.).]
  17. Визель Т.Г. Основы нейропсихологии. Теория и практика. Москва.: АСТ. 2021; 544 с. [Vizel' T.G. Osnovy nejropsihologii. Teoriya i praktika. Moskva.: AST. 2021; 544 s. (In Russ.).]




Creative Commons License
The content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

©


This is an open article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by the National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology.