Issue 24-1, 2025

Original article

Effectiveness of Gait Training with Electromyogram in Stroke Patients: an Experimental Longitudinal Pilot Study



1,2,3 ORCIDDmitry V. Skvortsov, 1,2,* ORCIDSergey N. Kaurkin, 1,2 ORCIDGalina E. Ivanova, 2 ORCIDNina K. Belonovskaya, 2 ORCIDAliya R. Khudaigulova

1 Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies, Moscow, Russia
2 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
3 Federal Research and Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies, Moscow, Russia


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION. Weakness in the tibialis anterior muscle caused by acute cerebral circulatory failure affects the speed, endurance, safety and quality of gait. Among various rehabilitation methods, electromyogram amplitude biofeedback (BFB) can be used. However, the available evidence on its effectiveness is conflicting.

AIM.  To study the possibility of restoring the function of the tibialis anterior muscle when walking by the biofeedback electromyogram amplitude training method in patients in the early recovery period of cerebral stroke

MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this study, we examined 22 patients (16 men and 6 women) who had suffered their first hemispheric ischaemic stroke and were in the early recovery period, with lesions in either the right or left cerebral hemisphere (15 right / 7 left). The patients received biofeedback walking training according to the electromyographic amplitude of the tibialis anterior muscle and an individual rehabilitation program. Prior to and following the rehabilitation program, gait biomechanics studies and examinations with clinical scales were conducted.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION  There was a significant improvement in clinical scales of assessment of walking skills and safety as a result of rehabilitation. The Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) indicator is approaching the low risk of falls parameter ( 19 points), as a result of which walking becomes safer. The objective diagnosis revealed typical changes and asymmetries associated with hemiparesis. A notable finding was the asymmetry in ankle joint amplitudes during the swing period, which was significantly greater than that of the contralateral side and the control group, characterized by foot drop syndrome. As a result of the training, the rhythm coefficient and the maximum electrical activity of m. rectus femoris and m. hamstring of the contralateral side significantly improved. Clinically and instrumentally, the walking function of patients with hemiparesis has a number of significant and minor improvements during the treatment period. Nevertheless, there is no evidence to suggest that these changes can be attributed to the training program implemented for the target parameter, namely the activity amplitude of the m. tibialis anterior.

CONCLUSION.  The effectiveness of training according to the target parameter of electromyogram amplitude for automated locomotion (walking), in the presence of paresis of the central genesis, can be questioned and requires further research.

REGISTRATION:  ClinicalTrails.gov identifier No. NCT06299943; Registered 19.07.2021.


KEYWORDS: gait, cerebral stroke, electromyographic amplitude, biofeedback, biofeedback training, myography, tibialis anterior muscle, gait recovery, gait biomechanics

FOR CITATION:

Skvortsov D.V., Kaurkin S.N., Ivanova G.E., Belonovskaya N.K., Khudaigulova A.R. Effectiveness of Gait Training with Electromyogram in Stroke Patients: an Experimental Longitudinal Pilot Study. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2025; 24(1):8–18. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2025-24-1-8-18 (In Russ.).

FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Sergey N. Kaurkin, Е-mail: kaurkins@bk.ru, kaurkin@fccps.ru


References:

  1. World Health Organization. 2020 [The top 10 causes of death]. (Accessed 09.12.2020). Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death
  2. The World Stroke Organization. Annual Report 2022. Available at: https://www.world-stroke.org/assets/downloads/WSO_Annual_Report_2022_-_online.pdf (Accessed 01.07.2024).
  3. Cauraugh J.H., Kim S.B. Chronic stroke motor recovery: duration of active neuromuscular stimulation. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2003; 215(1–2): 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-510X(03)00169-2
  4. Dorsch S., Ada L., Canning C.G., et al. The strength of the ankle dorsiflexors has a significant contribution to walking speed in people who can walk independently after stroke: an observational study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93(6): 1072–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.005
  5. Ng S.S., Hui-Chan C.W. Contribution of ankle dorsiflexor strength to walking endurance in people with spastic hemiplegia after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93(6): 1046–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.016
  6. Mazzucchelli M., Mazzoleni D., Campanini I., et al. Evidence-based improvement of gait in post-stroke patients following robot-assisted training: A systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2022; 51(4): 595–608. https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-220024
  7. Nam Y.G., Lee J.W., Park J.W., et al. Effects of Electromechanical Exoskeleton-Assisted Gait Training on Walking Ability of Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100(1): 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.020
  8. Dantas M.T.A.P., Fernani D.C.G.L., Silva T.D.D., et al. Gait Training with Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Mobility in People Post-Stroke. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(9): 5728. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20095728
  9. Mao Y.R., Zhao J.L., Bian M.J., et al. Spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic assessment of the effects of a foot drop stimulator for home-based rehabilitation of patients with chronic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022; 19(1): 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01036-0
  10. Sabut S.K., Sikdar C., Kumar R., et al. Functional electrical stimulation of dorsiflexor muscle: effects on dorsiflexor strength, plantarflexor spasticity, and motor recovery in stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011; 29(4): 393–400. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-2011-0717
  11. Cheng J.S., Yang Y.R., Cheng S.J., et al. Effects of combining electric stimulation with active ankle dorsiflexion while standing on a rocker board: a pilot study for subjects with spastic foot after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91(4): 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.022
  12. Ho C., Adcock L. Foot Drop Stimulators for Foot Drop: A Review of Clinical, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Nov. 21, 2018. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537874/ (Accessed 01.07.2024).
  13. Ng S.S., Hui-Chan C.W. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation combined with task-related training improves lower limb functions in subjects with chronic stroke. Stroke. 2007; 38(11): 2953–2959. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490318
  14. Jaqueline da Cunha M., Rech K.D., Salazar A.P., et al. Functional electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve improves post-stroke gait speed when combined with physiotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021; 64(1): 101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2020.03.012
  15. Frisk R.F., Jensen P., Kirk H., et al. Contribution of sensory feedback to plantar flexor muscle activation during push-off in adults with cerebral palsy. J Neurophysiol. 2017; 118(6): 3165–3174. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00508.2017
  16. Dost Sürücü G., Tezen Ö. The effect of EMG biofeedback on lower extremity functions in hemiplegic patients. Acta Neurol Belg. 2021; 121(1): 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-019-01261-w
  17. Aiello E., Gates D.H., Patritti B.L., et al. Visual EMG Biofeedback to Improve Ankle Function in Hemiparetic Gait. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2005; 2005: 7703–7706. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1616297
  18. Santucci V., Alam Z., Liu J, et al. Immediate improvements in post-stroke gait biomechanics are induced with both real-time limb position and propulsive force biofeedback. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023; 20(1): 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01154-3
  19. Spomer A.M., Conner B.C., Schwartz M.H., et al. Audiovisual biofeedback amplifies plantarflexor adaptation during walking among children with cerebral palsy. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023; 20(1): 164. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01279-5
  20. Bertucco M., Nardon M., Mueske N., et al. The Effects of Prolonged Vibrotactile EMG-Based Biofeedback on Ankle Joint Range of Motion During Gait in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Case Series. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2023; 43(3): 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2022.2151391
  21. Kaźmierczak K., Wareńczak-Pawlicka A., Miedzyblocki M., et al. Effect of Treadmill Training with Visual Biofeedback on Selected Gait Parameters in Subacute Hemiparetic Stroke Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(24): 16925. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416925
  22. Tamburella F., Moreno J.C., Herrera Valenzuela D.S., et al. Influences of the biofeedback content on robotic post-stroke gait rehabilitation: electromyographic vs joint torque biofeedback. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019; 16(1): 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0558-0
  23. Скворцов Д.В., Кауркин С.Н., Иванова Г.Е., и др. Целенаправленная тренировка ходьбы в раннем восстановительном периоде у больных с церебральным инсультом (предварительное исследование). Клиническая практика. 2021; 12(4): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.17816/clinpract77334[Skvortsov D.V., Kaurkin S.N., Ivanova G.E., et al. Targeted walking training of patients in the early recovery period of cerebral stroke (preliminary research). Journal of Clinical Practice. 2021; 12(4): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.17816/clinpract77334 (In Russ.).]
  24. Chen G., Patten C., Kothari D.H., et al. Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait Posture. 2005; 22: 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.06.009
  25. Boudarham J., Roche N., Pradon D., et al. Variations in Kinematics during Clinical Gait Analysis in Stroke Patients. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6): e66421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066421
  26. Wang Y., Mukaino M., Ohtsuka K., et al. Gait characteristics of post-stroke hemiparetic patients with different walking speeds. Int J Rehabil Res. 2020; 43(1): 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000391
  27. Kibushi B. Electromyography biofeedback to improve dynamic motion. Recent Advances in Alternative Medicine. Jul. 9, 2023. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1002064 (Accessed 01.07.2024).
  28. Skvortsov D.V., Kaurkin S.N., Ivanova G.E. A Study of Biofeedback Gait Training in Cerebral Stroke Patients in the Early Recovery Phase with Stance Phase as Target Parameter. Sensors. 2021; 21(21): 7217. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217217



Creative Commons License
The content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

©


This is an open article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by the National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology.