Issue №6-21, 2022

https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2022-21-6-78-90

Evaluation of the Somatotype of Patients with Class 1, 2 and 3 Obesity According to the Heath-Carter Scheme Using Various Formulas

View article (Download PDF file)



Download XML file

1 ORCIDMuradin M. Semenov, 1 ORCIDKseniya V. Vybornaya, 1 ORCIDRadzhabkadi M. Radzhabkadiev, 1 ORCIDKamilat M. Gapparova, 1,2 ORCIDKhaider' K. Sharafetdinov, 1 ORCIDZainudin M. Zainudinov, 1,2 ORCIDDmitriy B. Nikityuk

1 Federal Research Center for Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety, Moscow, Russian Federation
2 I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation


ABSTRACT

AIM. The purpose of this work was to study the somatotypological characteristics of patients with non-communicable diseases and obesity of class 1, 2 and 3; compare three methods to evaluate the somatotype using three types of complex formulas according to the Heath-Carter scheme; to check the reliability and informativeness of the method of bioimpedance evaluation of somatotype components by regression formulas used in bioimpedance analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS. 145 patients (67 men, mean age 41.4±10.3 years and 78 women, mean age 40.6±9.4 years) with class 1, class 2 and class 3 obesity, were examined at the clinic of the Federal Research Center of Nutrition and Biotechnology. Anthropometric measurements were taken. Bioimpedance evaluation of body composition was performed using the analyzer ABC-01 "Medas". The somatotype was determined according to the Heath-Carter scheme using three types of complex formulas – based on anthropometry and based on a bioimpedance study of body composition.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. Based on anthropometric and bioimpedance studies, a characterization of somatotypes according to the Heath-Carter scheme in patients with alimentary-dependent pathologies and class 1, class 2 and class 3 obesity is presented. Significant differences were shown in the values of the somatotype components ENDO and MESO, obtained by calculation using the formulas implemented in the software of the bioimpedance analyzer, from the values obtained by calculating by formulas based on anthropometry.

CONCLUSION. The degree of gender dimorphism was different when determining the somatotype according to the Heath-Carter scheme in patients with class 1, class 2 and class 3 obesity, and it depended on what particular formulas were used to calculate the scores. Pronounced gender dimorphism was noted when using both versions of the regression formulas, because they take into account the gender of the individual being examined. It was shown that these formulas are not applicable for evaluation of the components of the somatotype in persons with obesity of class 1, class 2 and class, because the coefficients of determination do not correspond to those previously obtained for a group of people with normal BMI values. We consider it expedient to develop new regression equations for evaluation of the somatotype of the above category of patients.


KEYWORDS: anthropometry, bioimpedance, physique, body composition, Heath-Carter somatotype, patients with non-communicable diseases, class 1, class 2 and class 3 obesity

For citation: Semenov M.M., Vybornaya K.V., Radzhabkadiev R.M., Gapparova К.M., Sharafetdinov H.H., Zainudinov Z.M., Nikityuk D.B. Evaluation of the Somatotype of Patients with Class 1, 2 and 3 Obesity According to the Heath-Carter Scheme Using Various Formulas. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2022; 21 (6): 78-90. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2022-21-6-78-90



References:

  1. Nikityuk D.B. Anthroponutriciology: the development of the ideas of the founders of a new scientific direction. Problems of Nutrition. 2020; 89(4): 82-88. https://doi.org/10.24411/0042-8833-2020-10044 (In Russ.).
  2. Nikityuk D.B. Anthroponutritiology as New Scientific Area. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathol- ogy. 2018; 7(4): 9-19. https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2018-7-4-9-19 (In Russ.).
  3. Alexeeva N.T., Rozhkova E.A., Klochkova S.V., Nikityuk D.B., Gasymova T.M., Kesemenli A.K. Peculiarities of Body Surface Area in Women of Different Somatotypes Regarding the Age. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2017; 6(2): 9-13 (In Russ.).
  4. Britton K.A., Massaro J.M., Murabito J.M., Kreger B.E., Hoffmann U., Fox C.S. Body Fat Distribution, Incident Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, and All- cause Mortality. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013; 62(10): 921-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.027
  5. Kang H.W., Seo S.P., Lee H.Y., Kim K., Ha Y.S., Kim W.T., Kim Y.J., Yun S.J., Kim W.J., Lee S.C. A high basal metabolic rate is an independent predictor of stone recurrence in obese patients. Investigative and Clinical Urology. 2021; 62(2): 195-200. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20200438
  6. Bukavneva N.S., Nikityuk D.B. Constitutional features of patients with alimentary-dependent pathology. Mor- phological Newsletter. 2008; 1(1-2): 145-146 (In Russ.).
  7. Nikolenko V.N., Nikityuk D.B., Chava S.V. Domestic constitutional anatomy in the aspect of personalized medicine. Sechenov Medical Journal. 2013; (4): 9-17 (In Russ.).
  8. Pashkova I.G., Gaivoronskii I.V., Nikityuk D.B. Somatotype and component composition of the body of an adult. Saint Peterburg. SpetsLit. 2019: 159 p. (In Russ.).
  9. Carter J.E.L. The heath-carter anthropometric somatotype. Instruction manual. San Diego State University. San Diego. CA. 2002; (4): 26 p.
  10. Heath B.H., Carter J.E.L. A modified somatotype method. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1967; 27(1): 57-74.
  11. Sheldon W.H., Stevens S.S., Tucker W.B. The varieties of human physique. Harper and Brothers. New York. 1940.
  12. Carter J.E.L., Carter J.E.L., Heath B.H. Somatotyping: development and applications. Cambridge university press. 1990; (5): 182-197.
  13. Koleva M., Nacheva A., Boev M. Somatotype and disease prevalence in adults. Reviews on Environmental Health. 2002; 17(1): 65-84.
  14. Martirosov E.G., Nikolaev D.V., Rudnev S.G. Technologies and methods for determining the composition of the human body. Moscow. Nauka. 2006: 248 p. (In Russ.).
  15. Kolesnikov V.A., Rudnev S.G., Nikolaev D.V., Anisimova A.V., Godina E.Z. About the new protocol for assessing the somatotype according to the Heath-Carter scheme in the software of the bioimpedance body composition analyzer. Moscow University Anthropology Bulletin. 2016; (4): 4-13 (In Russ.).
  16. Sindeeva L.V., Rudnev S.G. Characteristics of age-sex variability of the somatotype according to Heath-Carter in adults and the possibility of its bioimpedance assessment (on the example of the Russian population of Eastern Siberia). Morphology. 2017; 151(1): 77-87 (In Russ.).
  17. Anisimova A.V., Godina E.Z., Nikolaev D.V., Rudnev S.G., Simini F., Bertemes-Filho P. Evaluation of the Heath-Carter somatotype revisited: new bioimpedance equations for children and adolescents. IFMBE Proceedings. Singapore-Heidelberg: Springer. 2016; (54): 80-83.
  18. Rudnev S.G., Negasheva M.A., Godina E.Z. Assessment of the Heath-Carter somatotype in adults using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019; 1272(1): 012001.
  19. Deryabin V.E. Short Guide to Solving Typical Problems of Biometric Processing of Anthropological Data. Moscow. 2005. Manuscript, deposited in VINITI №1187-V2005, 29.08.2005. (In Russ.).
  20. Semenov M.M., Vybornaya K.V., Lapik I.A., Sheragulova V.S., Lebedeva V.A., Lavrinenko S.V., Radzhabkadiev R.M., Zainudinov Z.M., Nikityuk D.B. Somatotypological Characteristics of Patients with Alimentarydependent Pathology in the Aspect of Sexual Dymorphism. Occupational Medicine and Human Ecology. 2020; (4): 87-94 (In Russ.).
  21. Klochkova S.V., Rozhkova E.A., Alekseeva N.T., Nikityuk D.B., Atyakshin D.A., Ksemenli A.K., Gasymova T.M. Features of the content of fat and muscle mass among young women of different constitutional groups. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2017; 6(1): 39-42 (In Russ.).
  22. Semenov M.M., Vybornaya K.V., Lapik I.A., Strutynskaya M.A., Radzhabkadiev R.M., Nikityuk D.B. Topography of fat deposition in patients with alimentary-dependent pathology in the aspect of sexual dimorphism. Occupational Medicine and Human Ecology. 2021; (4): 190-202 (In Russ.).
  23. Yang L.T., Wang N., Li Z.X., Liu C., He X., Zhang J.F., Han H., Wen Y.F., Qian Y.H., Xi H.J. Study on the adult physique with the Heath-Carter anthropo- metric somatotype in the Han of Xi’an. China. Anatomical Science International. 2016; 91(2): 180-187.
  24. Pastuszak A., Gajewski J., Buśko K. The impact of skinfolds measurement on somatotype determination in Heath-Carter method. PLOS One. 2019; 14(9): e0222100 p.
  25. Rudnev S.G., Anisimova A.V., Sindeeva L.V., Zadorozhnaya L.V., Lukina S.S., Malakhina A.V., Vashura A.Yu., Tseytlin G.Ya., Godina E.Z. Methodologi- cal Issues in Studying Variations in Subcutaneous Fat: Comparison of Different Types of Calipers. Moscow University Anthropology Bulletin. 2017; (3): 4-26 (In Russ.).



Creative Commons License
The content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

©

Эта статья открытого доступа по лицензии CC BY 4.0. Издательство: ФГБУ «НМИЦ РК» Минздрава России.
This is an open article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by the National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology.

Aссоциация НАЭСКЛ