Issue 1-22, 2023

https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2023-22-1-98-109

Telemedicine Technologies Efficacy in a Complex Rehabilitation Program: аn Open Controlled Study of 64 Patients after Transpedicular Spine Fixation

View article (Download PDF file)



Download XML file

1 ORCIDIrena V. Pogonchenkova, 1 ORCIDEvgeniya V. Orlova, 1 ORCIDDmitriy A. Somov, 2 ORCIDVadim D. Damino, 2 ORCIDIrina G. Gorokhova

1 Moscow Centre for Research and Practice in Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine, Moscow,Russian Federation
2 N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, Moscow, Russian Federation


ABSTRACT

AIM. To evaluate the efficiency of telemedicine technologies in the complex rehabilitation of patients after transpedicular fixation of the lumbar spine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS. 64 patients (38 men and 26 females, age 31 to 67 years) after transpedicular fixation of the lumbar spine where included in the study. All patients underwent 2-weeks inpatient medical rehabilitation. The telemedicine platform «Steps Reabil» was used in the study group (35 patients) for home-based rehabilitation. Patients received e-mail links to the video recording of 10 home-based physical exercises. The control group (29 patients) received a leaflet describing similar 10 physical exercises. Rehabilitation diagnosis by ICF domains (b28013, b7303, b7600, d4500, e1151), backache on 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and on Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Spielberger-Khanin reactive anxiety test, Beck depression inventory (BDI), 10-meters walking test were evaluated before starting home-based physical exercises and after 1 month.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. The best patient adherence (74 %) to regular home-based physical exercises using the telemedicine platform was observed after 2 weeks, by the 2nd month the adherence decreased. Telerehabilitation improved the values of the qualifiers of ICF domains, reduced backache on VAS by 43.2 % (p < 0.05), on RDQ by 47.8 % (p < 0.05), HAQ by 57.1 % (p < 0.01), 10-meters walking test by 39.0 % (p < 0.05), reactive anxiety level by 30.6 % (p < 0.05), subclinical depression symptoms on BDI by 44.2 % (p < 0.05), with statistically significant differences from the control group in most parameters (р < 0.05), excluding 10-meters walking test. These results are consistent with the data of numerous studies that have demonstrated the efficiency of technology-based distance telerehabilitation in patients with various diseases.

CONCLUSION. Telemedicine technologies allow to conduct the individual home-based rehabilitation program, to control its efficiency, which ensures the continuity of rehabilitation activities at all stages.


KEYWORDS: Telemedicine technologies allow to conduct the individual home-based rehabilitation program, to control its efficiency, which ensures the continuity of rehabilitation activities at all stages

FOR CITATION: Pogonchenkova I.V., Orlova E.V., Somov D.A., Daminov V.D., Gorokhova I.G. Telemedicine Technologies Efficacy in a Complex Rehabilitation Program: аn Open Controlled Study of 64 Patients after Transpedicular Spine Fixation. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2023; 22(1): 98-109. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2023-22-1-98-109

FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Evgeniya V. Orlova, E-mail: yevorlova@mail.ru


References:

  1. Chronic back pain. Clinical guidelines. Ed. I.N. Denisov. Moscow. 2014: 20 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Buladzhov E.B., Lyulin S.V., Tsitsimushkin A.A. A review of treatment methods for degenerative spinal stenosis in lumbar spine. Bulletin of the Ural State Medical University. 2020; (4): 37-40 (In Russ.).
  3. Chernyaev A.V., Slinyakov L.Yu., Khurtsilava N.D. Surgical treatment of degenerative lesions of the lumbar spine: history, traditional approaches (lecture). Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2014; 2(10): 20-26 (In Russ.).
  4. Sampiev M.T., Zagorodniy N.V., Abakirov M.Dzh., Laka A.A., Dubov A.B., Shishkin Yu.V. A method of surgical treatment of central herniated discs in the lumbar spine. Bulletin of RUDN University, series Medicine. 2008; (4): 81-85 (In Russ.).
  5. Seron P., Oliveros M., Gutierrez-Arias R., Fuentes-Aspe R., Torres-Castro R.C., Merino-Osorio C., Nahuelhual P., Inostroza J., Jalil Y., Solano R., Marzuca- Nassr G.N., Aguilera-Eguía R., Lavados-Romo P., Soto-Rodríguez F.J., Sabelle C., Villarroel-Silva G., Gomolán P., Huaiquilaf S., Sanchez P. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in physical therapy: a rapid overview. Physical Therapy. 2021; 101(6): pzab053. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab053
  6. Agostini M., Moja L., Banzi R., Pistotti V., Tonin P., Venneri A., Turolla A. Telerehabilitation and recovery of motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2015; 21(4): 202-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X15572201
  7. Chughtai M., Kelly J. J, Newman J.M., Sultan A.A., Khlopas A., Sodhi N., Bhave A., Kolczun M.C., Mont M.A. The role of virtual rehabilitation in total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Knee Surgery. 2019; 32(1): 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1637018
  8. Rintala A., Päivärinne V., Hakala S., Paltamaa J., Heinonen A., Karvanen J., Sjögren T. Effectiveness of technology-based distance physical rehabilitation interventions for improving physical functioning in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2019; 100(7): 1339-1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.007
  9. Rintala A., Hakala S., Paltamaa J., Heinonen A., Karvanen J., Sjögren T. Effectiveness of technology-based distance physical rehabilitation interventions on physical activity and walking in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2018; 40(4): 373-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1260649
  10. Cramer S.C., Dodakian L., Le Vu, See J., Augsburger R., McKenzie A., Zhou R. J., Chiu N. L., Heckhausen J., Cassidy J. M, Scacchi W., Smith M. T., Barrett A M, Knutson J., Edwards D., Putrino D., Agrawal K., Ngo K., Roth E.J., Tirschwell D.L., Woodbury M.L., Zafonte R., Zhao W., Spilker J., Wolf S.L., Broderick J.P., Janis S. Efficacy of home-based telerehabilitation vs in-clinic therapy for adults after stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurology. 2019; 76(9): 1079-1087. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1604
  11. Choi Y.H., Paik N.J. Mobile Game-based virtual reality program for upper extremity stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2018; (133): 56241. https://doi.org/10.3791/56241
  12. Karpov O.E., Daminov V.D., Novak E.V., Gorohova I.G., Slepneva N.I., Streltsov A.N., Subbotin S.A. Information and technology support of medical rehabilitation organization. Bulletin of the National Medical and Surgical Center named after N.I. Pirogov. 2022; 17(1): 76-83 (In Russ.).



Creative Commons License
The content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

©


This is an open article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by the National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology.