Issue №4-22, 2023

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2023-22-4-31-40

Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients after Ischemic Stroke: a Prospective Study

View article (Download PDF file)



Download XML file

1 ORCID Dzhinna I. Lebedeva, 1 ORCID Elena F. Turovinina, 2 ORCID Irina E. Desyatova, 1 ORCID Aleksander N. Erokhin, 3 ORCID Liana T. Khasanova

1 Tyumen State Medical University, Tyumen, Russia
2 Regional Medical and Rehabilitation Center, Tyumen, Russia
3 City Clinical Hospital No. 31 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION. Despite the fact that a large number of studies are focused on the rehabilitation of patients with ischemic stroke in the early recovery period, currently, much attention is paid to improving existing and developing new technologies in neurorehabilitation at the early stages of the disease. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising technology for the rehabilitation and recovery of patients with movement disorders after a stroke, which has a direct effect on the premotor cortex of the brain.
AIM. To assess the effectiveness of TMS in relation to daily activity in a comprehensive medical rehabilitation program in patients with ischemic stroke in the early recovery period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study included 124 patients aged 55–75 years (53.2 % men and 46.8 % women). The main group included 64 people who received the TMS procedure. The comparison group included 60 patients who received an identical course of treatment, but instead of TMS, they underwent a low-intensity headband magnetic therapy. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using the Rivermead Mobility Index, Rehabilitation Routing Scales, and NIHSS. The severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms was assessed using the HADS scale. The total duration of treatment was 21 days.
The dynamics of the patients’ condition was assessed before the start of treatment, 21 days after the course of rehabilitation and 3 months after the start of treatment.
RESULTS. The main group showed a significant decrease in neurological deficit according to the NIHSS scale from 15.3 ± 3.6 to 10.1 ± 1.7 (p < 0.05), Rivermead Mobility Index decreased from 5.6 ± 1.9 to 10.5 ± 2.4 (p < 0.05) and Rehabilitation Routing Scale decreased from 4.3 ± 0.8 to 2.5 ± 0.5 points (p < 0.05) since the start of rehabilitation and 3 months after its start. After 3 months, the neurological deficit in the main group was statistically significantly less compared to patients in the comparison group (p < 0.5). A significant decrease in depressive symptoms was found in the main group (χ2 = 28.641; p < 0.001), while in the control group the dynamics was not significant (χ2 = 7.140; p = 0.129); in addition, there was a regression of the anxiety component both in the main (χ2 = 47.949; p < 0.001) and control (χ2 = 12.483; p = 0.015) groups.
CONCLUSION. The use of the TMS device at the second stage of rehabilitation significantly reduces the neurological deficit, increases the mobility of patients, and reduces the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms.

KEYWORDS: ischemic stroke, rehabilitation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, neurological deficiency, depression, anxiety

Acknowledgments: The study had no sponsorship.

Conflict of interest:: The authors declare no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

For citation: Lebedeva D.I., Turovinina E.F., Desyatova I.E., Erokhin A.N., Khasanova L.T. Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients after Ischemic Stroke: a Prospective Study. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2023; 22(4):31-40. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2023-22-4-31-40 (In Russ.). 

For correspondence: Elena F. Turovinina, E-mail: turovinina@tyumsmu.ru



Список литературы:

  1. Springer M.V., Skolarus L.E., Feng C., Burke J.F. Functional Impairment and Postacute Care Discharge Setting May Be Useful for Stroke Survival Prognostication. Journal of American Heart Association. 2022; 11(6): e024327. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024327
  2. Орлова А.С., Лисиченко Д.А., Чер И.С. и др. Осведомленность населения о факторах риска и основных симптомах инсульта (обзор литературы). Профилактическая медицина. 2015; 18(6): 91–96. https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed201518691-96 [Orlova A.S., Lisichenko D.A., Cher I Sun et al. Public awareness of stroke risk factors and warning symptoms (a review of literature). Profilakticheskaja medicina. 2015; 18(6): 91–96. https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed201518691-96 (In Russ.).]
  3. Campbell B.C.V., Khatri P. Stroke. Lancet. 2020; 396(10244): 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31179-X
  4. Buma F., Kwakkel G., Ramsey N. Understanding upper limb recovery after stroke. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 2013; 31(6):707–722. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-130332
  5. Gong Y., Long X.M., Xu Y. et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function and cortex excitability in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2021; 35(5): 718–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520972940
  6. van Lieshout E.C.C., van der Worp H.B., Visser-Meily J.M.A., Dijkhuizen R.M. Timing of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Onset for Upper Limb Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Neurology. 2019; 10: 1269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01269
  7. Hordacre B., Comacchio K., Moseley G.L. The unusual case of dental pain with sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: A benign idiosyncrasy or diagnostic opportunity? Brain Stimulation. 2020; 13(2): 422–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.12.003
  8. Приказ Минздрава России от 31 июля 2020 г. № 788н Об утверждении порядка организации медицинской реабилитации взрослых (в ред. Приказа Минздрава России от 07.11.2022 No 727н) [Prikaz Minzdrava Rossii ot 31 July 2020 g. No 788n Ob utverzhdenii porjadka organizacii medicinskoj reabilitacii vzroslyh (v red. Prikaza Minzdrava Rossii ot 07.11.2022 No 727n (In Russ.).] https://normativ.kontur.ru/document?moduleId = 1&documentId = 438476
  9. Назарова М.А., Новиков П.А., Никулин В.В., Иванова Г.Е. Диагностические возможности транскраниальной магнитной стимуляции для прогнозирования двигательного восстановления после инсульта. Нервно-мышечные болезни. 2020; 10(1): 64–74. https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-8721-2020-10-1-64-74 [Nazarova M.A., Novikov P.A., Nikulin V.V., Ivanova G.E. Diagnostic capabilities of transcranial magnetic stimulation to predict motor recovery after a stroke. Nervno-myshechnye bolezni. 2020; 10(1): 64–74 https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-8721-2020-10-1-64-74 (In Russ.).]
  10. Гумарова Л.Ш., Бодрова Р.А., Хасанова Д.Р. и др. Клиническая эффективность «беспороговой» низкочастотной транскраниальной магнитной стимуляции у пациентов с ишемическим инсультом. Вопросы курортологии, физиотерапии и лечебной физической культуры. 2020; 97(5): 39–44. [Gumarova L.Sh., Bodrova R.A., Khasanova D.R. et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. Voprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii i lechebnoj fizicheskoj kul’tury. 2020; 97(5): 39–44 (In Russ.).] https://doi.org/10.17116/kurort20209705139
  11. Cantone M., Lanza G., Vinciguerra L. et al. Age, Height, and Sex on Motor Evoked Potentials: Translational Data From a Large Italian Cohort in a Clinical Environment. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2019; 13: 185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00185
  12. Lefaucheur J.P., André-Obadia N., Antal A. et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clinical Neurophysiology. 2014; 125(11): 2150–2206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021
  13. Rossini P.M., Burke D., Chen R. et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2015; 126(6): 1071–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001
  14. Ziemann U., Reis J., Schwenkreis P., Rosanova M. et al. TMS and drugs revisited 2014. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2015; 126(10): 1847-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.08.028
  15. Kobayashi M., Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology. Lancet Neurophysiology. 2003; 2: 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00321-1
  16. Fitzgerald P.B., Fountain S., Daskalakis Z.J. A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2006; 117: 2584–2596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.712
  17. Hoogendam J.M., Ramakers G.M.J., Di Lazzaro V. Physiology of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Brain Stimulation. 2010; 3: 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2009.10.005
  18. Jang S.H. Motor function-related maladaptive plasticity in stroke: a review. NeuroRehabilitation 2013; 32(2): 311–316. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-130849
  19. Dionísio A., Duarte I.C., Patrício M., Castelo-Branco M. The Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2018; 27(1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.09.008
  20. Blesneag A.V., Slăvoacă D.F., Popa L. et al. Low-frequency rTMS in patients with subacute ischemic stroke: clinical evaluation of short and long-term outcomes and neurophysiological assessment of cortical excitability. Journal of Medicine and Life. 2015; 8(3): 378–387.
  21. Rose D.K., Patten C., McGuirk T.E., Lu X., Triggs W.J. Does inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augment functional task practice to improve arm recovery in chronic stroke? Stroke Research and Treatment. 2014; 2014: 305236. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/305236
  22. Harvey R.L., Edwards D., Dunning K. et al. Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery in Stroke. Stroke. 2018; 49 (9): 2138–2146. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020607
  23. Tyson S.F., Hanley M., Chillala J. et al. The relationship between balance, disability, and recovery after stroke: predictive validity of the Brunel Balance Assessment. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2007; 21(4): 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968306296966
  24. Thibaut A., Chatelle C., Ziegler E. et al. Spasticity after stroke: physiology, assessment and treatment. Brain Injury. 2013; 27(10): 1093–1105. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2013.804202
  25. Barros Galvão S.C., Borba Costa dos Santos R., Borba dos Santos P. Efficacy of coupling repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and physical therapy to reduce upper-limb spasticity in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2014; 95(2): 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.023
  26. Hordacre B., Comacchio K., Williams L., Hillier S. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression: a randomised trial with neurophysiological insight. Journal of Neurology. 2021; 268(4): 1474–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10315-6
  27. Feng W., Wang J., Chhatbar P.Y. Corticospinal tract lesion load: An imaging biomarker for stroke motor outcomes. Annals of Neurology. 2015; 78(6): 860–870. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24510
  28. Di Pino G., Pellegrino G., Assenza G. Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2014; 10(10): 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2014.162



Creative Commons License
The content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

©

Эта статья открытого доступа по лицензии CC BY 4.0. Издательство: ФГБУ «НМИЦ РК» Минздрава России.
This is an open article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by the National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology.