A Review of International Experience for Telerehabilitation of Post-stroke Patients with Aphasia and Cognitive Problems

^1,2 Vitaly A. Nikolaev, ² Olga G. Safonicheva, ³ Alexander A. Nikolaev

¹ Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
² I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
³ National University of Science and Technology “MISiS”, Moscow, Russian Federation

Резюме:

Stroke remains one of the most common reasons of disabilities worldwide. Aphasia, memory and cognitive problems are amongcommon stroke consequences signifi cantly reducing stroke survivors’ life quality. To grant access of a large number of stroke survivorsto rehabilitation services, and sustain continuous rehabilitation during pandemic, the telerehabilitation can be used.This article summarizes current approaches on telerehabilitation of post-stroke patients with aphasia, cognitive and memory problems.Authors made a search of research articles and review papers from international medical journals indexed in Scopus, Sciencedirect,and PubMed databases. The resluts show that the telerehabilitation is feasible providing signifi cant clinical outcomes and can beorganized synchronously and asynchronously to meet needs for increasing demand of post-stroke patients. Despite the positive eff ectsof telerehabilitation, there were some limitations. To overcome these limitations, further clinical studies on large groups are needed.

Ключевые слова: telerehabilitation; post-stroke telerehabilitation; cognitive rehabilitation; memory rehabilitation; aphasia; exergames; virtual reality (VR)

Для цитирования: Nikolaev V.A., Safonicheva O.G., Nikolaev A.A. A Review of International Experience for Telerehabilitation of Post-stroke Patients with Aphasia and Cognitive Problems. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2022; 21 (1):64-69. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2022-21-1-64-69

Список литературы:

1. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Available at: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds). (accessed 27.12.2021)
2. Katan M., Luft A. Global Burden of Stroke. Seminars in Neurology. 2018; 38(2): 208–211. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1649503
3. Doogan C., Dignam J., Copland D., Leff A. Aphasia Recovery: When, How and Who to Treat? Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. 2018; 18(12): 90 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-018-0891-x
4. Alferova V. V., Shklovskiĭ V. M., Ivanova E. G., Ivanov G. V., Mayorova L. A., Petrushevsky A. G., Kuptsova S. V., Gekht1 A. B. The prognosis for post- stroke aphasia. S. S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2018; 118(4): 20–29. https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro20181184120-29
5. Ivanova G. E., Melnikova E. V., Levin O. S., Khatkova S. E., Khasanova D. R., Yanishevsky S. N., Daminov V. D., Vasenina E. E., Gurkina M. V. Current is- sues in the rehabilitation of stroke patients against the background of a new coronavirus infection (COVID-19). Resolution of the Council of Ex- perts. S. S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2020; 120(8–2): 81–87. https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202012008281
6. Maggio M. G., De Luca R., Manuli A., Calabrò R. S. The fi ve ‘W’ of cognitive telerehabilitation in the Covid-19 era. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2020; 17(6): 473–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2020.1776607
7. Torrisi M., Maresca G., De Cola M. C., Cannavò A., Sciarrone F., Silvestri G., Bramanti A., De Luca R., Calabrò R. S. Using telerehabilitation to improve cognitive function in post-stroke survivors: is this the time for the continuity of care? International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2019; 42(4): 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000369
8. Bernini S., Stasolla F., Panzarasa S., Quaglini S., Sinforiani E., Sandrini G., Vecchi T., Tassorelli C., Bottiroli S. Cognitive Telerehabilitation for Older Adults with Neurodegenerative Diseases in the COVID-19 Era: A Perspective Study. Frontiers in Neurology. 2021; (11): 623933 p. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.623933
9. Mantovani E., Zucchella C., Bottiroli S., Federico A., Giugno R., Sandrini G., Chiamulera C., Tamburin S. Telemedicine and Virtual Reality for Cogni- tive Rehabilitation: A Roadmap for the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Neurology. 2020; (11): 926 p. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00926
10. Lawson D. W., Stolwyk R. J., Ponsford J. L., McKenzie D.P., Downing M. G., Wong D. Telehealth Delivery of Memory Rehabilitation Following Stroke.
11. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2020; 26(1): 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617719000651
12. Faria A. L., Pinho M. S., Bermúdez I Badia S. A comparison of two personalization and adaptive cognitive rehabilitation approaches: a randomized con- trolled trial with chronic stroke patients. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2020; 17(1): 78 p. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00691-5
13. Cogollor J. M., Rojo- Lacal J., Hermsdörfer J., Ferre M., Arredondo Waldmeyer M. T., Giachritsis C., Armstrong A., Breñosa Martinez J. M., Bautis- ta Loza D. A., Sebastián J. M. Evolution of Cognitive Rehabilitation After Stroke from Traditional Techniques to Smart and Personalized Home- Based Information and Communication Technology Systems: Literature Review. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies. 2018; 5(1): e4. https://doi.org/10.2196/rehab.8548
14. Macoir J., Sauvageau V. M., Boissy P., Tousignant M., Tousignant M. In- Home Synchronous Telespeech Therapy to Improve Functional Com- munication in Chronic Poststroke Aphasia: Results from a Quasi- Experimental Study. Telemedicine Journal and e- Health. 2017; 23(8): 630–639. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2016.0235
15. Maresca G., Maggio M. G., Latella D., Cannavò A., De Cola M. C., Portaro S., Stagnitti M. C., Silvestri G., Torrisi M., Bramanti A., De Luca R., Cal- abrò R. S. Toward Improving Poststroke Aphasia: A Pilot Study on the Growing Use of Telerehabilitation for the Continuity of Care. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2019; 28(10): 104303 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104303
16. Gerber S. M., Schütz N., Uslu A. S., Schmidt N., Röthlisberger C., Wyss P., Perny S., Wyss C., Koenig- Bruhin M., Urwyler P., Nyff eler T., Marchal- Crespo L., Mosimann U. P., Müri R. M., Nef T. Therapist- Guided Tablet- Based Telerehabilitation for Patients with Aphasia: Proof-of-C oncept and Usability Study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies. 2019; 6(1): e13163 p. https://doi.org/10.2196/13163
17. Kurland J., Liu A., Stokes P. Eff ects of a Tablet-B ased Home Practice Program with Telepractice on Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2018; 61(5): 1140–1156. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0277
18. Cherney L. R., Lee J. B., Kim K. A., van Vuuren S. Web-based Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia: A pilot randomized control trial. Clinical Rehabil- itation. 2021; 35(7): 976–987. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520988475
19. Meltzer J. A., Baird A. J., Steele R. D., Harvey S. J. Computer- based treatment of poststroke language disorders: a non-inferiority study of telereha- bilitation compared to in-person service delivery. Aphasiology. 2018; (32): 290–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2017.1355440
20. Øra H. P., Kirmess M., Brady M. C., Sørli H., Becker F. Technical Features, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Augmented Telerehabilitation in Post-stroke Aphasia- Experiences From a Randomized Controlled Trial. Frontiers in Neurology. 2020; (11): 671 p. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00671
21. Braley M., Pierce J. S., Saxena S., De Oliveira E., Taraboanta L., Anantha V., Lakhan S. E., Kiran S. A Virtual, Randomized, Control Trial of a Digital Therapeutic for Speech, Language, and Cognitive Intervention in Post-stroke Persons With Aphasia. Frontiers in Neurology. 2021; (12): 626780 p. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.626780
22. Pitt R., Hill A. J., Theodoros D., Russell T. “I defi nitely think it’s a feasible and worthwhile option”: perspectives of speech- language pathologists providing online aphasia group therapy. Aphasiology. 2018; 32(9): 1031–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1482403

Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.