Issue 23-3, 2024

Original article

https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2024-23-3-21-31

Features of sensorimotor response of students with different types of attitude to the disease: a cross-sectional study

View article (Download PDF file)



Download XML file

1 ORCIDAlexander V. Dobrin, 1 ORCIDOksana E. Elnikova, 1 ORCIDIrina G. Kolosova

1 Bunin Yelets State University, Yelets, Russia


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION. One of the key psychophysiological features of a subject who has lost his health is sensorimotor response, reflecting the features of neuroplasticity, and allowing us to understand how much a person is able to adapt to the changed living conditions that the disease inevitably imposes. In turn, achieving the desired result of rehabilitation will become more effective if, when building rehabilitation measures, it is taken into account how a person with certain health problems treats his changed condition, that is, to determine the type of attitude to the disease of a participant in rehabilitation measures.

AIM. To study the features of simple and complex sensorimotor reactions in boys and girls with different types of attitudes to the disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS. 160 subjects (average age — 21 ± 2.3 years) of both sexes were examined. The main criterion for the sample formation was the different level of health of the study participants. Respondents with 2 and 3 health groups were selected. The diagnosis of the types of attitude to the disease was carried out using the “Type of attitude to the disease” technique. The fixation of the sensorimotor response was performed using the Rebus computer technique, which allows recording a simple and complex sensorimotor reaction.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. It was revealed that harmonious (25 %), anosognosic (10.6 %) and ergopathic (20.6 %) types of attitude to the disease predominate in the group of subjects. Shown: 1) subjects with anosognosic type have the highest accuracy of a simple sensorimotor reaction (−0.12 ± 0.12), compared with the other two identified types of attitude to the disease (p < 0.05); 2) subjects with anosognosic type have the lowest values of the average execution time of a complex sensorimotor reaction (361.51 ± 31.14), compared with subjects with a harmonious (386.19 ± 32.18) and ergopathic (396.50 ± 50.05) type of attitude to the disease; 3) the quality (R = 0.299, R2 = 0.090 at p = 0.020) and accuracy (R = 0.293, R2 = 0.086 at p = 0.023) of a simple sensorimotor reaction affect the type of attitude to the disease.

CONCLUSION. In subjects with different types of attitude to the disease, the features of sensorimotor response differ from each other. The most effective sensorimotor reactions are performed by subjects with an anosognosic type of attitude to the disease. The type of attitude to the disease and the parameters of sensorimotor response, such as the quality and accuracy of a simple sensorimotor reaction are related to each other.


KEYWORDS: sensorimotor response, neuronal plasticity, type of attitude to disease, inhibitory control

FUNDING: The study had no sponsorship.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

FOR CITATION:

 Dobrin A.V., Elnikova O.E., Kolosova I.G. Features of Sensorimotor Response of Students with Different Types of Attitude to the Disease: a Cross-Sectional Study. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2024; 23(3):21-31. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2024-23-3-21-31

ДЛЯ КОРРЕСПОНДЕНЦИИ:

Добрин Александр Викторович, Е-mail: doktor-alexander@mail.ru


References:

  1. Бояк Т.Н. Здоровье как ценность. Медико-фармацевтический журнал «Пульс». 2016; 18(9): 142–146. [Boyak T.N. Health as a value. Medical & pharmaceutical journal «Pulse». 2016; 18(9): 142–146 (In Russ.).]
  2. Петраш М.Д., Муртазина И.Р. Понятие «здоровый образ жизни» в психологических исследованиях. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология. 2018; 8(2): 152–165. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.204 [Petrash M.D., Murtazina I. R. The definition of “healthy lifestyle” in psychological research. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology. 2018; 8(2): 152–165. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.204 (In Russ.).]
  3. Шклярук В.Я., Васекин Ю.И., Коновалова М.П. Формирование представлений о здоровье и продолжительности жизни человека. Промышленность: экономика, управление, технологии. 2018; 2(71): 200–204. [Shklyaruk V.Ya., Vasekin Yu.I., Konovalova M.P. Promoting awareness of health and life expectancy. Industry: Economics, Management, Technology. 2018; 2(71): 200–204 (In Russ.).]
  4. Gayathri R., Manyeswari P., Mahanta P., Bapu K.G.V. Relationship between Health Promoting Behaviors, Self-compassion and Health Value among Medical Students. International Journal of Indian Psychology. 2023; 11(3): 628–637. https://doi.org/10.25215/1103.060
  5. Аналитический центр НАФИ. Как изменились образ жизни и здоровье россиян в 2023 году. Доступно на: https://nafi.ru/analytics/kak-izmenilis-obraz-zhizni-i-zdorove-rossiyan-v-2023-godu/ (Дата обращения: 12.01.2024). [Analiticheskij centr NAFI. Kak izmenilis’ obraz zhizni i zdorov’e rossiyan v 2023 godu. Available at: https://nafi.ru/analytics/kak-izmenilis-obraz-zhizni-i-zdorove-rossiyan-v-2023-godu/ (Accessed January 12, 2024) (In Russ.).]
  6. Покида А.Н., Зыбуновская Н.В. Реализация принципов здорового образа жизни в современных условиях россиянами различных социально-демографических групп. Здоровье населения и среда обитания — ЗНИСО. 2024; 32(1): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2024-32-1-15-27 [Pokida A.N., Zybunovskaya N.V. Implementation of principles of a healthy lifestyle by contemporary Russians from different socio-demographic groups. Public Health and Life Environment — PH&LE. 2024; 32(1): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2024-32-1-15-27 (In Russ.).]
  7. Давитадзе А.П., Александрова Е.А., Купера А.В. и др. Использование российской системы здравоохранения пациентами: результаты национального мониторинга общественного здоровья. Здоровье населения и среда обитания — ЗНИСО. 2023; 31(8): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2023-31-8-7-16 [Davitadze A.P., Aleksandrova E.A., Kupera A.V. et al. Health care utilization in Russia: Public health survey findings. Public Health and Life Environment — PH&LE. 2023; 31(8): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2023-31-8-7-16 (In Russ.).]
  8. Байдакова Н.В. Формирование системы реабилитации и восстановительной медицины в России. Известия высших учебных заведений. Социология. Экономика. Политика.2017; 3: 16–20. [Baidakova N.V. Formation of the system of rehabilitation and restorative medicine in Russia. Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Sociology. Economy. Politics. 2017; 3: 16–20 (In Russ.).]
  9. Мещерякова Б.Г., Зинченко В.П. Большой психологический словарь. 4-е изд. СПб.: Прайм-Еврознак, 2009. 811 с. [Meshcheryakova B.G., Zinchenko V.P. Bol’shoj psihologicheskij slovar’. 4th izd. SPb.: Prajm-Evroznak, 2009. 811 p. (In Russ.).]
  10. Фазлеева Е.В. Шалавина А.С., Васенков Н.В. и др. Состояние здоровья студенческой молодежи: тенденции, проблемы, решения. Мир науки. Педагогика и психология. 2022; 10(5): 01PDMN522. [Fazleeva E.V., Shalavina A.S., Vasenkov N.V., Martyanov O.P., Fazleev A.N. Health status of youth students: trends, problems, solutions. World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology. 2022; 10(5): 01PDMN522 (In Russ.).]
  11. Журавлева И.В., Лакомова И.В. Здоровье молодежи как объект социальной политики. Социальные аспекты здоровья населения (электронный научный журнал). 2018; 62(4): 4–8. https://doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2018-62-4-8 [Zhuravleva I.V., Lakomova N.V. Health of Youth as a Object of Social Policy. Social Aspects of Population Health (Scientific E-Journal). 2018; 62(4): 4–8. https://doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2018-62-4-8 (In Russ.).]
  12. Нечаев В.С., Магомедова З.А. Медицинская реабилитация: история вопроса и дефиниции. Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2017; 25 (4): 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0869-866X-2017-25-4-221-225 [Nechaev V.S., Magomedova Z.A. The medical rehabilitation: history and definitions. The Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine. 2017; 25 (4): 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0869-866X-2017-25-4-221-225 (In Russ.).]
  13. Самыличев А.С. Возможности физической реабилитации и самореабилитации. Научное обозрение. Медицинские науки. 2016; 4: 93–106. [Samylichev A.S. Abilites of psycal rehabilitation and self-rehabilitation. Scientific Review. Medical Sciences. 2016; 4: 93–106 (In Russ.).]
  14. Цверкунова К.С., Грицина А.П. Роль лечебно-оздоровительной физической культуры в реабилитации инвалидов. Международный студенческий научный вестник. 2017; 6: 141. [Tsverkunova K.S., Gritsina A.P. The role of medical and recreational physical culture in the rehabilitation of disabled people. European Student Scientific Journal. 2017; 6: 141 (In Russ.).]
  15. Назирова А.А., Давыдова С.С., Егоров Р.С. Физкультурно-оздоровительная реабилитация школьников. Наука-2020. 2021; 4 (49): 213–218. [Nazirova A.A., Davydova S.S., Egorov R.S. Physical culture and health rehabilitation of school children. Science-2020. 2021; 4(49): 213–218 (In Russ.).]
  16. Плясунова А.А. Роль физической культуры в профилактике и реабилитации различных заболеваний. Актуальные исследования. 2024; 2(184): 79–81. [Plyasunova A.A. The role of physical education in the prevention and rehabilitation of favoious diseases. Current Research. 2024; 2(184): 79–81 (In Russ.).]
  17. Громыко Е.В., Соколова Э.А. Исторический аспект внутренней картины болезни (обзор литературы). Проблемы здоровья и экологии. 2012; (1): 37–44. https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2012-9-1-6 [Gromyko E.V., Sokolova E.A. Historical aspects of the inward picture of a disease (literature review). Health and Ecology Issues. 2012; (1): 37–44. https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2012-9-1-6 (In Russ.).]
  18. Smania N., Picelli A., Gandolfi M., et al. Rehabilitation of sensorimotor integration deficits in balance impairment of patients with stroke hemiparesis: a before/after pilot study. Neurological Sciences. 2008; 29: 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-008-0988-0
  19. Павлов К.И., Мухин В.Н. Физиологические механизмы нейропластичности как основа психических процессов и социально-профессиональной адаптации (Часть 1). Психология. Психофизиология. 2021; 14(3): 119–136. [Pavlov K.I., Mukhin V.N. Physiological Mechanisms of Neuroplasticity as a Basis of Mental Processes and Socio-Professional Adaptation (Part 1). Psychology. Psychophysiology. 2021; 14(3): 119–136 (In Russ.).]
  20. Вощилова Н.В. Сенсомоторная интеграции как психофизиологическая база развития интеллекта слабослышащих младших школьников. Проблемы современного педагогического образования. 2019; 62(3): 47–50. [Voshilova N.V. Sensomotor integration as a psychophysiological basis for the intellect development of hearing impaired primary school children. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education. 2019; 62(3): 47–50 (In Russ.).]
  21. Баранов А.А., Клочкова О.А., Куренков А.Л. и др. Роль пластичности головного мозга в функциональной адаптации организма при детском церебральном параличе с поражением рук. Педиатрическая фармакология. 2012; 9(6): 24–32. https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v9i6.515 [Baranov A.A., Klochkova O.A., Kurenkov A.L., et al. The role of brain plasticity in the functional adaptation of body at cerebral infantile paralysis with the affection of hands. Pediatric pharmacology. 2012; 9(6): 24–32. https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v9i6.515 (In Russ.).]
  22. Гомазков О.А. Нейрогенез как адаптивная функция взрослого мозга. Успехи современной биологии. 2013; 133(4): 349–366. [Gomazkov O.A. Neirogenesis as an adaptive function of brain. Uspekhi sovremennoi biologii. 2013; 133(4): 349–366 (In Russ.).]
  23. Комлева Ю.К., Салмина А.Б., Прокопенко С.В. и др. Изменения структурно-функциональной пластичности головного мозга, индуцированные обогащенной средой. Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук. 2013; 68(6): 39–48. [Komleva Yu.K., Salmina A.B., Prokopenko S.V., et al. Changes in Structural and Functional Plasticity of the Brain Induced by Environmental Enrichment. Annals of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2013; 68(6): 39–48 (In Russ.).]
  24. Johnston M.V. Plasticity in the developing brain: implications for rehabilitation. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 2009; 15(2): 94–101.
  25. Черникова Л.А. Пластичность мозга и современные реабилитационные технологии. Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии. 2007; 1(2): 34–39 [Chernikova L.A. Brain plasticity and modern rehabilitation technologies. Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology. 2007; 1(2): 34–39 (In Russ.).]
  26. Francis J.T., Song W. Neuroplasticity of the sensorimotor cortex during learning. Neural Plasticity. 2011; 2011: 310737. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/310737
  27. Костенко Е.В. Нейропластичность — основа современной концепции нейрореабилитации. Медицинский алфавит. 2016; 14(2): 5–11. [Kostenko E.V. Neuroplasticity as basis for modern concepts of neurorehabilitation. Medical Alphabet. 2016; 14(2): 5–11. (In Russ.).]
  28. Wu H., Yan H., Yang Y., et al. Occupational Neuroplasticity in the Human Brain: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Neuroimaging Studies. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2020; 14: 215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00215
  29. Дамулин И.В., Екушева Е.В. Клиническое значение феномена нейропластичности при ишемическом инсульте. Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии. 2016; 10(1): 57–64. [Damulin I.V., Ekusheva E.V. A clinical value of neuroplasticity in ischemic stroke. Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology. 2016; 10(1): 57–64 (In Russ.).]
  30. Амамчян А.Э., Гафиятуллина Г.Ш. Нейропластичность как основа двигательной реабилитации. Медицинский вестник Юга России. 2023; 14(4): 122–128. https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2023-14-4-122-128 [Amamchyan A.E., Gafiyatullina G.Sh. Neuroplasticity as the basis of motor rehabilitation. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2023; 14(4): 122–128. https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2023-14-4-122-128 (In Russ.).]
  31. Вассерман Л.И., Иовлев Б.В., Карпова. Э.Б. и др. Психологическая диагностика отношения к болезни: пособие для врачей. Санкт-Петербургский научно-исследовательский психоневрологический институт им. В.М. Бехтерева, 2005. 33 с. [Vasserman L.I., Iovlev B.V., Karpova. E.B. i dr. Psihologicheskaya diagnostika otnosheniya k bolezni: posobie dlya vrachej. Sankt-Peterburgskij nauchno-issledovatel’skij psihonevrologicheskij institut im. V.M. Bekhtereva, 2005. 33 p. (In Russ.).]
  32. Vergunov E.G. Nikolaeva E.I., Balioz N.V., et al. Lateral preferences as the possible phenotypic predictors of the reserves of the cardiovascular system and the features of sensorimotor integration in climbers. Human physiology. 2018; 44(3): 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119718030143
  33. Корнеев А.А., Кричевец А.Н. Условия применимости критериев Стьюдента и Манна–Уитни. Психологический журнал. 2011; 32(1): 97–110. [Korneev A., Krichevets A. Conditions for Student T-Test and Mann-Whitney U-Test. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2011; 32(1): 97–110 (In Russ.).]
  34. Вассерман Л.И., Трифонова Е.А., Щелкова О.Ю. Эмоционально-личностные факторы формирования отношения к болезни у больных сахарным диабетом 1-го типа. Проблемы Эндокринологии. 2006; 52(1): 6–10. [Wasserman L.I., Trifonova E.A., Shchelkovo O.Yu. Affective and personal determinants of formation of an attitude towards the disease in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Problems of Endocrinology. 2006; 52(1): 6–10 (In Russ.).]
  35. Мотовилин О.Г., Шишкова Ю.А., Дивисенко С.И. и др. Психологические эффекты достижения компенсации сахарного диабета 1-го типа у пациентов молодого возраста. Сахарный диабет. 2010; 13(1): 66–76. https://doi.org/10.14341/2072-0351-6019 [Motovilin O.G., Shishkova Yu.A., Divisenko S.I., et al. Psychological aspects of glycemic control in young patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Mellitus. 2010; 13(1): 66–76. https://doi.org/10.14341/2072-0351-6019 (In Russ.).]
  36. Zahra R., Baig KB., Sadiq U. Illness acceptance, diabetes specific distress and quality of life in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Pakistan Journal of Physiology. 2020; 16: 37–40.
  37. Awonug M.A., Olapegba P.O., Uye E.E. Social Support, Health Locus of Control and Psychological Acceptance as Predictors of Perceived Quality of Life among Diabetic Patients. Nigerian Psychological Research. 2022; 7 (1): 28–39.
  38. Kaelberer C., Tanenbaum M. The Promising Role of Self-Compassion in Managing Type 1 Diabetes. Endocrines. 2023; 4: 293–311. https://doi.org/10.3390/endocrines4020024
  39. Voils C.I., Steffens D.C., Flint E.P., Bosworth H.B. Social support and locus of control as predictors of adherence to antidepressant medication in an elderly population. The American journal of geriatric psychiatry. 2005; 13(2): 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajgp.13.2.157
  40. Мотовилин О.Г., Лунякина О.В., Суркова Е.В. и др. Отношение к болезни пациентов с сахарным диабетом 1-го и 2-го типа. Сахарный диабет. 2012; 15(4): 51–58. https://doi.org/10.14341/2072-0351-5538 [Motovilin O.G., Lunyakina O.V., Surkova E.V., et al. Attitudes in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2. Diabetes mellitus. 2012; 15(4): 51–58. https://doi.org/10.14341/2072-0351-5538 (In Russ.).]
  41. Вергунов Е.Г., Николаева Е.И. Оценка психофизиологической стоимости креативности в междисциплинарных исследованиях. Вестник психофизиологии. 2014; 1: 74–82. [Vergоunov E.G., Nikolaeva E.I. The assessment of the creativity’s psychophysiological value in interdisciplinal research. Psychophysiology News. 2014; 1: 74–82 (In Russ.).]
  42. Zysset A.E., Kakebeeke T.N., Messerli-Bürgy N., et al. Predictors of Executive Functions in Preschoolers: Findings from the SPLASHY Study. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018; 9: 2060. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02060
  43. Nelson T.D., Nelson J.M., Mason W.A., et al. Executive Control and Adolescent Health: Toward A Conceptual Framework. Adolescent Research Review. 2019; 4: 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-018-0094-3
  44. Разумникова О.М., Николаева Е.И. Тормозные функции мозга и возрастные особенности организации когнитивной деятельности. Успехи физиологических наук. 2019; 50(1): 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0301179819010090 [Razumnikova O.M., Nikolaeva E.I. Inhibitory Brain Functions and Age-Associated Specificities in Organization of Cognitive Activity. Uspekhi fiziologicheskikh nauk. 2019; 50(1): 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0301179819010090 (In Russ.).]
  45. Shulman G.L., Fiez J.A., Corbetta M., et al. Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: II.: decreases in cerebral cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1997; 9: 648–663. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.648
  46. Andrews-Hanna J.R. The brain’s default network and its adaptive role in internal mentation. The Neuroscientist. 2012; 18(3): 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858411403316
  47. Beaty R.E., Chen Q., Christensen A.P., et al. Brain networks of the imaginative mind. Dynamic functional connectivity of default and cognitive control networks relates to openness to experience. Human Brain Mapping. 2018; 39: 811–821.
  48. Bertossi E., Ciaramelli E. Ventromedial prefrontal damage reduces mind-wandering and biases its temporal focus. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2016; 11(11): 1783–1791. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw099
  49. Фейгенберг И.М. Быстрота моторной реакции и вероятностное прогнозирование. Физиология человека. 2008; 34(5): 51–62. [Feigenberg I.M. Speed of Motor Reaction and Probabilistic Forecasting. Human Physiology.2008; 34(5): 51–62 (In Russ.).]
  50. Нехорошкова А.Н., Грибанов А.В., Депутат И.С. Сенсомоторные реакции в психофизиологических исследованиях (обзор). Журнал медико-биологических исследований. 2015; 1: 38–48. [Nekhoroshkova A.N., Gribanov A.V., Deputat I.S. Sensomotor Reactions in Psychophysiological Studies (Review). Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2015; 1: 38–48 (In Russ.).]
  51. Nikolaeva E.I., Shirokova I.V., Vergunov E.G. The ratio of working memory and parameters of sensorimotor integration in the go-go paradigm in children 7–8 years old. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2018; 131(S): S61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.07.182
  52. Гусев Е.И., Боголепова А.Н. Роль процессов нейропластичности в развитии депрессивных расстройств. Трудный пациент. 2010; 8(10): 11–16. [Gusev E.I., Bogolepova A.N. The role of neuroplasticity processes in the development of depressive disorders. Difficult Patient. 2010; 8(10): 11–16 (In Russ.).]
  53. Гуляева Н.В. Молекулярные механизмы нейропластичности: расширяющаяся вселенная. Биохимия. 2017; 82(3): 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297917030014 [Gulyaeva N.V. Molecular mechanisms of neuroplasticity: an expanding universe. Biochemistry (Moscow). 2017; 82(3): 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297917030014 (In Russ.).]
  54. Kempermann G., Kuhn H.G., Gage F.H. More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. Nature. 1997; 386(6624): 493–495. https://doi.org/10.1038/386493a0
  55. Rampon C., Jiang C.H., Dong H., et al. Effects of environmental enrichment on gene expression in the brain. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2000; 97(23):12880–12884.
  56. Shors T.J., Miesegaes G., Beylin A., et al. Neurogenesis in the adult is involved in the formation of trace memories. Nature. 2001; 410(6826): 372–376. https://doi.org/10.1038/35066584
  57. Jankowsky J.L., Melnikova Т., Fadale D.J., et al. Environmental enrichment mitigates cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Neuroscience. 2005; 25(21): 5217–5224. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5080-04.2005
  58. Qin P., Northoff G. How is our self-related to midline regions and the default-mode network? NeuroImage. 2011; 57(3): 1221–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.028
  59. Omu O., Reynolds F. Religious faith and self-efficacy among stroke patients in Kuwait: health professionals’ views. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2014; 36(18): 1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.892641
  60. Савельева Ж.В. «Здоровье» и «Болезнь» в интерпретативных моделях ислама и православия. Социально-гуманитарные знания. 2010; 5: 274–287. [Savelyeva Z.V. «Health» and «Illness» in the Interpretative Models of Islam and Orthodox Church. Social and humanitarian knowledge. 2010; 5: 274–287 (In Russ.).]
  61. Alves R., Alves H., Barboza R., et al. The influence of religiosity on health. Ciência & saúde coletiva. 2010; 15(4): 2105–2111. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232010000400024
  62. Koenig H.G., Larson D.B., Larson S.S. Religion and coping with serious medical illness. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2001; 35(3): 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.10215




Creative Commons License
The content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

©


This is an open article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by the National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology.