Issue 2-22, 2023

Original article

https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2023-22-2-42-51

Effect of Bioplastic Material on Adhesion, Growth and Proliferative Activity of Human Fibroblasts when Incubated in Solutions Mimic the Acidity of Wound an Acute and Chronic Inflammation

View article (Download PDF file)



Download XML file

1 ORCIDPavel A. Markov 1 ORCIDPetr S. Eremin 2 ORCIDNikita M. Paderin 1 ORCIDIlmira R. Gilmutdinova 1 ORCIDElena Yu. Kostromina 1 ORCIDAnastasia I. Greben 1 ORCIDAnatoliy D. Fesyun

1Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology
2Institute of Physiology of Federal Research Centre «Komi Science Centre of the Urals Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences»


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION. One of the key stages of wound healing is the phase of inflammation, which is a transitional process between hemostasis and wound healing. Each stage of the inflammatory-reparative process is characterized by its own value of the acidity of the wound bed. For example, in the acute stage of inflammation, the acidity of the medium in the wound bed decreases to a pH of 5.5-6. The chronic stage of the inflammatory process, on the contrary, is accompanied by an increase in pH to 8. To date, so far, the effect of biomaterials containing components of the intercellular matrix of the human dermis on fibroblasts under acidosis and alkalosis has not been fully investigated.

AIM. To define the effect of bioplastic material based on collagen, hyaluronic acid and elastin on the viability and proliferative activity of human fibroblasts in conditions simulating the acidity of acute and chronic wounds.

MATERIAL AND METHODS. Bioplastic material was made according to the method described in patent RU 2722744. Adhesive properties and proliferative activity of human fibroblasts were assessed visually using fluorescent microscopy. The number of apoptotic and dead cells was assessed by flow cytometry (BD FACSCanto II) using the commercial FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Pharmingen). The strength, Young’s modulus, and elasticity of the gels were determined on a TA.XT-plus texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, Great Britain).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. Using the methods of luminescent microscopy and flow cytometry, we found that the cell viability (namely, adhesive properties and proliferative activity) decreases after incubation on condition mimic of physiological acidosis. We found that, bioplastic material contributes to the preservation of adhesive properties, viability and proliferative activity of fibroblasts in physiological acidosis conditions.

CONCLUSION. The results obtained indicate that bioplastic material based on soluble dermis components can be used as a biologically active component of wound dressings for increase the effectiveness of reparative regeneration, especially in cases of excessive acute inflammation.


KEYWORDS: biomaterials, collagen, hyaluronic acid, elastin, fibroblasts, adhesion, proliferation, apoptosis, acidity

FUNDING: The study had no sponsorship.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

FOR CITATION:

Марков П.А., Еремин П.С., Падерин Н.М., Гильмутдинова И.Р., Костромина Е.Ю., Гребень А.И., Фесюн А.Д. Влияние биопластического материала на адгезию, рост и пролиферативную активность фибробластов человека в средах, имитирующих кислотность раневого ложа при остром и хроническом воспалении. Вестник восстановительной медицины. 2023; 22(2):42-51. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2023-22-2-42-51 [Markov P.A., Eremin P.S., Paderin N.M., Gilmutdinova I.R., Kostromina E.Yu., Greben A.I., Fesyun A.D. Effect of Bioplastic Material on Adhesion, Growth and Proliferative Activity of Human Fibroblasts when Incubated in Solutions Mimic the Acidity of Wound an Acute and Chronic Inflammation. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2023; 22(2): 42-51. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2023-22-2-42-51 (In Russ.).


References:

  1. Shpichka A., Butnaru D., Bezrukov E.A. et al. Skin tissue regeneration for burn injury. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2019; 10(1): 94 p. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1203-3
  2. Sheikholeslam M., Wright M E.E., Jeschke M G., Amini-Nik S Biomaterials for Skin Substitutes. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2018; 7(5): 20 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700897
  3. Regier M.C., Montanez-Sauri S I., Schwartz M P. et al. The Influence of Biomaterials on Cytokine Production in 3D Cultures. Biomacromolecules. 2017; 18(3): 709–718. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01469
  4. Hakimi N., Cheng R., Leng L. et al. Handheld skin printer: in situ formation of planar biomaterials and tissues. Lab on a Chip. 2018; 18(10): 1440–1451. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7lc01236e
  5. Gilmutdinova I R., Kostromina E., Yakupova R D., Eremin P S. Development of nanostruc-tured bioplastic material for wound healing. European Journal of Translational Myology. 2021; 31(1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2021.9388
  6. Gilmutdinova I R., Kostromina E.Yu., Yakupova R D., Eremin P S. Creation of a novel nanostrnctured bioplastic material for combustiology. Biotekhnologiya. 2020; 36(4): 65–68 (In Russ.).
  7. Cabral L.R.B., Teixeira L N., Gimenez R.P. et al. Effect of Hyaluronic Acid and Poly-L-Lactic Acid Dermal Fillers on Collagen Synthesis: An in vitro and in vivo Study. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology. 2020; (13): 701–710. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S266015
  8. Schneider L.A., Korber A., Grabbe S. et al. Influence of pH on wound-healing: a new perspective for wound-therapy. Archives of Dermatological Research. 2007; (298): 413–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-006-0713-x
  9. Matsuki T., Pédron T., Regnault B. et al. Epithelial cell proliferation arrest induced by lactate and acetate from Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium breve. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4): e63053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063053
  10. Shan T., Chen S., Chen X. et al. M2-TAM subsets altered by lactic acid promote T-cell apoptosis through the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway. Oncology Reports. 2020; 44(5): 1885–1894. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2020.7767
  11. Quinn W.J. 3rd, Jiao J., TeSlaa T. et al. Lactate Limits T Cell Proliferation via the NAD(H) Redox State. Cell Reports. 2020; 33(11): 108500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108500
  12. Gomez-Gutierrez J.G., Bhutiani N., McNally M.W. et al. The neutral red assay can be used to evaluate cell viability during autophagy or in an acidic microenvironment in vitro. Biotechnic & Histochemistry. 2021; 96(4); 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10520295.2020.1802065
  13. Liu Y., Kalén A., Risto O., Wahlström O Fibroblast proliferation due to exposure to a platelet concentrate in vitro is pH dependent. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2002; 10(5): 336–340.
  14. Jiang D., Rinkevich Y Scars or Regeneration? Dermal Fibroblasts as Drivers of Diverse Skin Wound Responses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(2): 617. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020617
  15. Zhang X., Kang X., Jin L. et al. Stimulation of wound healing using bioinspired hydrogels with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2018; (13): 3897–3906. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S168998
  16. Gilmutdinova I.R., Eremin P S. Organ-specific bioplastic material based on soluble form of stabilized extracellular matrix. RU Patent RU 2722744, A61L27/44. 2020. (In Russ.).
  17. Avery D., Govindaraju P., Jacob M. et al. Extracellular matrix directs phenotypic heterogeneity of activated fibroblasts. Matrix Biology. 2018; (67): 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2017.12.003
  18. Katoh K. FAK-Dependent Cell Motility and Cell Elongation. Cells. 2020; 9(1): 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9010192
  19. Wolf M.T., Daly K.A., Brennan-Pierce E P. et al. A hydrogel derived from decellularized dermal extracellular matrix. Biomaterials. 2012; 33(29): 7028–7038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.051
  20. Drobnik J., Pietrucha K., Piera L. et al. Collagenous scaffolds supplemented with hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate used for wound fibroblast and embryonic nerve cell culture. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2017; 26(2): 223–230. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/62835
  21. Suh H., Lee J.E. Behavior of fibroblasts on a porous hyaluronic acid incorporated collagen matrix. Yonsei Medical Journal. 2002; 43(2): 193–202. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2002.43.2.193
  22. Schneider L.A., Korber A., Grabbe S., Dissemond J Influence of pH on wound-healing: a new perspective for wound-therapy? Archives of Dermatological Research. 2007; 298(9): 413–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-006-0713-x
  23. Grab B., Miles A J., Furcht L.T., Fields G B. Promotion of fibroblast adhesion by triple-helical peptide models of type I collagen-derived sequences. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1996; 271(21): 12234–12240. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.21.12234
  24. Kruse C.R., Singh M., Targosinski S. et al. The effect of pH on cell viability, cell migration, cell proliferation, wound closure, and wound reepithelialization: In vitro and in vivo study. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2017; 25(2): 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12526
  25. Marin M M., Ianchis R., Leu Alexa R. et al. Development of New Collagen/Clay Composite Biomaterials. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 23(1): 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010401
  26. Catoira M.C., Fusaro L., Di Francesco D. et al. Overview of natural hydrogels for regenerative medicine applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2019; 30(10): 115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6318-7
  27. Meyer M Processing of collagen-based biomaterials and the resulting materials properties. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 2019; 18(1): 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0647-0



Creative Commons License
The content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

©


This is an open article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by the National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology.