Issue 25-1, 2026

Original article

Effectiveness of a Rehabilitation Program for Post-Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Study



ORCIDViktor S. Kostenich*

S.I. Georgievsky Order of the Red Banner of Labor Medical Institute, Simferopol, Russia


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION.  Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers in men, with an annual increase in incidence, mainly due to early stages. Radical prostatectomy (RPE) is the main method of radical treatment for clinically significant PCa, but this method often leads to urinary incontinence (UI). There are many different methods of conservative treatment for this group of patients with UI in the postoperative period, but scattered data in the literature indicate that there is no single standard for the combination of methods for treating UI.

AIM.  To compare the effectiveness of the proposed medical rehabilitation program for patients with UI after RPE with standard management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS.  This prospective clinical study was conducted from September 2021 to May 2025 at St. Luke Multidisciplinary Clinical Hospital (V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University) and the Department of Rehabilitation Treatment of Health and Rehabilitation Technologies Scientific and Clinical Centre (V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University). The study included 142 patients after RPE, divided into two groups: modified treatment (n = 63) and control (n = 79). The median follow-up period was 366 days. Both groups underwent pelvic floor muscle training. The modified treatment group additionally used biofeedback, pelvic floor muscle electrostimulation, and Nordic walking as elements of a comprehensive rehabilitation programme.

RESULTS.  Preoperative parameters and 1-month postoperative outcomes did not show statistically significant differences between the groups. 3 months after surgery, UI was observed in 25 % of patients in the modified treatment group versus 52 % in the control group (p = 0.001), and urine loss volume was 35 % lower (9 mL vs 14 mL; p = 0.008). After 6 months, UI persisted in 16 % versus 39 % (p = 0.002), and urine loss volume was 37 % lower (4 mL vs 6 mL; p = 0.016). Pelvic floor muscle strength was higher in the modified treatment group in 3 and 6 months (119 and 131 cm of water vs 109 and 126 cm of water; p < 0.01). Quality of life scores measured by EORTC QLQ-C30/PR25 improved significantly in 3, 6, and 12 months (77, 80 and 80 points vs 69, 71 and 78 points; p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION.  The findings indicate that modified comprehensive rehabilitation ensures faster recovery of urinary continence in the early stages after RPE (3–6 months), which is manifested by a decrease in the frequency of UI, a reduced volume of urinary leakage, and a more pronounced increase in pelvic floor muscle strength. The parallel improvement in quality of life indicators confirms the clinical significance of the effect and its translation into patient-centred outcomes.

CONCLUSION.  The modified medical rehabilitation program promotes faster restoration of urinary continence after RP compared with standard treatment. The greatest benefit was observed in the mid-term follow-up, potentially reducing the period of social maladaptation and decreasing the burden on the healthcare system.


KEYWORDS: urinary incontinence, radical prostatectomy, men’s rehabilitation, rehabilitative treatment, medical rehabilitation, pelvic floor muscle training, electrical stimulation, Nordic walking

FOR CITATION: Kostenich V.S. Effectiveness of a Rehabilitation Program for Post-Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Study. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2026; 25(1):53–64. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2026-25-1-53-64 (In Russ.).

FOR CORRESPONDENCE:

Viktor S. Kostenich, E-mail: v-kostenich@mail.ru, vskostenich@cfuv.ru


References:

  1. Global Cancer Observatory. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2024. Available at: https://gco.iarc.who.int (Accessed: 12.06.2025).
  2. Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Шахзадова А.О. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2023 году. Москва: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена — филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России. 2024. 281 с. [Kaprin A.D., Starinskiy V.V., Shakhzadova A.O. The state of oncological care for the population of Russia in 2023. Moscow: Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 2024. 281 p. (In Russ.).]
  3. Федеральная служба государственной статистики. Демографический ежегодник России. Официальное издание. Статистический сборник. Mосква. 2023. 256 c. [Federal State Statistics Service. Demographic Yearbook of Russia. Official Edition. Statistical handbook. Moscow. 2023. 256 p. (In Russ.).]
  4. Bill-Axelson A., Holmberg L., Garmo H., et al. Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer — 29-Year Follow-up. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(24): 2319–2329. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1807801
  5. Resnick M.J., Koyama T., Fan K.H., et al. Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(5): 436–445. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1209978
  6. Nahon I. Physiotherapy management of incontinence in men. J Physiother. 2021; 67(2): 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2021.02.010
  7. Gezginci E., Goktas S., Ata A. Effect of perioperative pelvic floor muscle training program on incontinence and quality of life after radical prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2023; 37(4): 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155221134477
  8. Pané-Alemany R., Ramírez-García I., Carralero-Martínez A., et al. Efficacy of transcutaneous perineal electrostimulation versus intracavitary anal electrostimulation in the treatment of urinary incontinence after a radical prostatectomy: randomized controlled trial study protocol. BMC Urol. 2021; 21(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00718-y
  9. Tantawy S.A., Elgohary H.M.I., Abdelbasset W.K., Kamel D.M. Effect of 4 weeks of whole-body vibration training in treating stress urinary incontinence after prostate cancer surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2019; 105(3): 338–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2018.07.013
  10. Yokoyama T., Nishiguchi J., Watanabe T., et al. Comparative study of effects of extracorporeal magnetic innervation versus electrical stimulation for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2004; 63(2): 264–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.024
  11. Bernardes M.F.V.G., Mata L.R.F.D., Azevedo C., et al. Effectiveness of systemic acupuncture in the control of urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022; 56: e20220135. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2022-0135en
  12. Barocas D.A., Alvarez J., Resnick M.J., et al. Association Between Radiation Therapy, Surgery, or Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer and Patient-Reported Outcomes After 3 Years published correction appears in JAMA. 2017; 317(11): 1126–1140. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.1704
  13. Milios J.E., Ackland T.R., Green D.J. Pelvic floor muscle training in radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial of the impacts on pelvic floor muscle function and urinary incontinence. BMC Urol. 2019; 19(1): 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0546-5
  14. Sciarra A., Viscuso P., Arditi A., et al. A biofeedback-guided programme or pelvic floor muscle electric stimulation can improve early recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2021; 75(10): e14208. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14208
  15. Anderson C.A., Omar M.I., Campbell S.E., et al. Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 1(1): CD001843. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001843.pub5
  16. Park S.W., Kim T.N., Nam J.K., et al. Recovery of overall exercise ability, quality of life, and continence after 12-week combined exercise intervention in elderly patients who underwent radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled study. Urology. 2012; 80(2): 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.12.060
  17. Tschentscher M., Niederseer D., Niebauer J. Health benefits of Nordic walking: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 44(1): 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.043



Creative Commons License
The content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

©


This is an open article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by the National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology.